Home Blog Page 55

Fivio Foreign Admits to Gun Threat on Woman During New Year’s Day Incident

On January 1, 2025, a routine encounter turned serious for Brooklyn rapper Fivio Foreign, aka Maxie Lee Ryles III. In the Edgewater section of New Jersey, a woman approached Ryles outside an apartment complex, requesting that he jump-start her car. Instead of helping her, however, Ryles is said to have drawn a gun and issued a threat:

“If I see you parked out in front of this building again, there is going to be a f***ing problem”

Security footage from the complex and the testimony of eyewitnesses supported her claim, creating a chilling portrait of the encounter. The episode turned quickly into a cause célèbre, generating attention because of the celebrity status of the respondent.

On January 5, 2025, Ryles was arrested and is still in custody. He had initially been charged with five counts: terroristic threats, illegal possession of a weapon, assault by a weapon, and two others. He pleaded guilty to the charges of third-degree terroristic threats on May 27, 2025, as part of a plea agreement, with the other four charges likely to be dropped. His lawyer, Adam Lustberg, is requesting that he be given probation when he is sentenced in August 2025, as he believes the time he is currently serving will be enough.

In New Jersey, a third-degree terroristic threat is defined as threatening an act of violence to intimidate or cause a disturbance in a public manner, like threatening with a weapon to intimidate. Third-degree terroristic threat can lead to a five-year jail sentence, though probation is an alternative depending on the circumstances of the case. Significantly, no weapon was seized, which Lustberg refers to as a flaw in the case for the prosecution as it is “one of the flimsiest” he’s handled in more than 20 years.

Fivio Foreign became a central figure in the drill music movement in Brooklyn with the 2019 single “Big Drip.” With his feature verses for artists such as Kanye West, Alicia Keys, and Lil Tjay, as well as the 2022 album B.I.B.L.E., which reached the top ten of the Billboard 200, he solidified himself within the world of hip-hop. Outside of music, Ryles has given back to the community by working with the Foreignside Foundation, a charity established to engage with and support vulnerable youth.

Nevertheless, though, Ryles’ professional life is not free from controversy. In April 2021, he got arrested in New Jersey for possession of a loaded handgun with a tampered-with serial number after leading the authorities on a chase. In August 2024, he was criticized for sharing a video clip from an online platform depicting a person injecting hard drugs, which he justified as a reflection of “street realities”.

The New Year’s Day incident has sparked varied reactions. Some fans express concern over the allegations, worried about the impact on Ryles’ career, while others are reserving judgment until the sentencing. Legal analysts note that the absence of a recovered firearm could weaken the prosecution’s case, but the guilty plea indicates sufficient evidence for the terroristic threats charge. Supporters highlight Ryles’ community work, while critics point to his history of legal troubles as a pattern.

2013 MGK Interview Causes Uproar: Disturbing Talk on Teens & Link to Diddy’s Record Deal

0

Machine Gun Kelly (MGK), born Colson Baker, finds himself at the center of renewed controversy as a 2013 interview resurfaces. The interview featured inappropriate remarks about a then-17-year-old Kendall Jenner, alongside fresh allegations about his conduct in December 2024. These incidents, spanning over a decade, have intensified scrutiny on the rapper-turned-pop-punk artist, whose career took off under Sean “Diddy” Combs’ Bad Boy Records in 2011.

As social media amplifies these revelations, MGK’s past statements and behaviors are again under the microscope, raising questions about accountability and public perception.

The most prominent issue stems from a 2013 Fuse TV “Intimate Interview” where MGK, then 23, made explicit comments about Kendall Jenner, who was underage at the time. When asked about his celebrity crush, he declared,

“I don’t care who my first celebrity crush was because right now it’s Kendall Jenner.”

The interviewer probed further, asking if he was “counting down the days until she’s 18,” to which MGK replied,

“I’m not waiting until she’s 18 I’ll go now I’m 23 dog like I’m not like a creepy age like you know what I’m saying I’m 23 bro she’s 17 and she’s like a celebrity like there there is no there is no limits right there.”

He doubled down by citing rock icons, noting,

“Robert Plant… dated a girl that was 14, Axl Rose… dated a girl that was 16.”

The clip, which resurfaced multiple times, exploded on TikTok in 2022, amassing over 3 million views. Social media erupted with users branding the remarks “disgusting,” “repulsive,” and “creepy,” appalled by MGK’s casual attitude toward pursuing a minor.

His additional comment,

“if Kendall Jenner is in your bedroom naked and you’re 50 you’re going,”

Further stoked outrage, cementing perceptions of a troubling mindset. Critics argue this reflects a broader pattern of inappropriate behavior toward young women, keeping the controversy alive years later.

In December 2024, adult film actress Amia Miley made startling claims about MGK on the “Inside OnlyFans” podcast. Without naming him directly, she alluded to him as “he’s about to be the father to Megan Fox’s baby,” leaving little doubt about her subject.

Miley alleged that MGK requested and consumed her urine during an encounter, recounting,

“I got to his house and he was like, ‘Go in the shower.’… He held out his hand and was like, ‘Okay, now pee.’”

MGK’s history of unconventional relationship practices adds context to these claims. His high-profile romance with Megan Fox famously included drinking each other’s blood, which Fox likened to childhood rituals on the “Call Her Daddy” podcast, saying it’s “a matter of what you’re accustomed to or what is currently socially acceptable.” This backdrop frames Miley’s allegations within MGK’s established pattern of boundary-pushing behavior.

X User
@xuser

A post from X.

Load X Post

The controversies extend beyond the Jenner incident. In 2022, a 2012 interview resurfaced where MGK, then 22, made fetishizing remarks about Black women. Responding to an interviewer’s playful comment,

“You recently tweeted that you like chocolate milk… I’m chocolate, you know,”

MGK offered crude generalizations about Black women’s sexual behavior. Musician Alice Glass condemned the clip, tweeting,

“Why, as a white man, would you ever talk like this? Fetishizing Black women and in such a disrespectful way!?”

Responses to MGK’s past statements vary. Some supporters argue the comments, now nearly a decade old, should be judged in their historical context and not define his current character. The Black woman who conducted the 2012 interview defended him, stating,

“This is me in the video. Girl give it a rest. I asked him a question and he answered. The end.”

Critics, however, insist the age of the remarks doesn’t excuse their nature, especially those involving minors, highlighting a divide in how accountability is perceived.

MGK’s career gained traction when he signed with Bad Boy Records in 2011, an Interscope Records imprinted with Sean “Diddy” Combs. This milestone followed four mixtapes and led to his 2012 debut album, Lace Up, which hit number four on the US Billboard 200. The label connection has added weight amid recent industry controversies, though no direct link ties it to MGK’s scandals.

Since then, MGK has reinvented himself, shifting from rap to pop-punk with 2020’s Tickets to My Downfall, produced by Travis Barker. The album topped the Billboard 200, a rare feat for a rock record that year. His 2022 follow-up, Mainstream Sellout, continued this trajectory, while his acting roles in films like Bird Box (2018) and The Dirt (2019), plus his 2022 directorial debut Good Mourning, showcase his versatility.

The resurfaced 2013 Kendall Jenner interview and December 2024 allegations from Amia Miley have thrust MGK’s past and present conduct into sharp focus. While the Jenner comments are documented and widely condemned, the recent claims remain unproven, complicating the narrative. Together, they underscore a pattern of controversial behavior spanning years and demographics, challenging MGK’s public image despite his artistic evolution.

Load YouTube Video

Hundreds of Judges in the U.S. Baffled by Nonstop Pizza From Unknown Senders

0

A disturbing pattern of intimidation targeting federal judges across the United States has emerged, involving anonymous pizza deliveries to their homes and those of their family members. In approximately two dozen documented cases nationwide, federal judges have received unsolicited pizza orders with the recipient’s name listed as “Daniel Anderl,” the late son of U.S. District Judge Esther Salas, who was murdered in 2020 by a gunman targeting his mother.

This coordinated campaign, dubbed “pizza doxxing” by federal prosecutors, has been described by Judge Salas as “psychological warfare” against the judiciary, prompting urgent calls for federal investigation and raising grave concerns about judicial security, particularly among judges presiding over cases involving the Trump administration.

The pizza doxxing campaign began in late February 2025, with the U.S. Marshals Service noting in a March memo from its Southern District of New York office that the incidents appeared linked to high-profile court cases. The campaign employs multiple pizza vendors and third-party delivery apps, spanning at least seven states, showcasing tactical sophistication that complicates efforts to trace the orders. The perpetrators have targeted judges at various levels, including Supreme Court justices, and even extended their reach to the children of some judges.

U.S. Circuit Judge J. Michelle Childs has emerged as a frequent target, receiving seven unsolicited pizza deliveries over several months. Notably, one delivery arrived shortly after she issued a ruling against the Trump administration, suggesting a direct link between judicial decisions and these intimidation attempts.

“It’s really an unnecessary and an unfortunate threat to our security when we’re trying to be judicial officers in a very neutral position,”

Childs told reporters, highlighting how she now relies on a Ring camera system to screen deliveries, avoiding direct contact with delivery personnel.

The use of Daniel Anderl’s name—a chilling reference to the 2020 murder of Judge Salas’s son—adds a menacing layer to the campaign, implying a threat of violence rooted in judicial history. Former FBI agent Mike Clark, head of the Society of Retired FBI Agents, warned that these deliveries “appear to be designed to send a threatening and menacing message to judges,” potentially serving as a tactic to confirm addresses for future attacks.

“They’re making a mockery of the justice system and playing a dangerous game,”

He added.

For Judge Childs and others, the campaign has forced significant changes in daily life.

“We are now not opening the door,”

She explained, underscoring the persistent fear and vigilance now required. Judge Salas emphasized the broader stakes:

“You need a strong judiciary for the system to work, and these deliveries represent an infringement on democracy generally.”

The intimidation threatens judicial independence, potentially pressuring judges to alter rulings to avoid further targeting.

The U.S. Marshals Service, tasked with judicial security, confirmed it is “looking into all the unsolicited pizza deliveries to federal judges and taking appropriate steps to address the matter.” Senate Judiciary Committee ranking member Dick Durbin escalated the issue on May 6, 2025, sending a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel, urging an investigation into what he called

“threats intended to show that those seeking to intimidate the targeted judge know the judge’s address or their family members’ address.”

Durbin’s letter highlighted the inclusion of Supreme Court justices and judges’ children among the targets, demanding a response by May 20.

In Washington, D.C., outgoing U.S. Attorney Ed Martin identified “pizza doxxed” as a priority for the federal prosecutor’s office, signaling that the incidents are being treated as serious crimes, possibly involving charges like threatening federal officials or obstructing justice. As of now, the perpetrators remain unidentified, and the investigation is ongoing.

The campaign’s use of Daniel Anderl’s name exploits a tragic chapter in judicial history. In July 2020, attorney Roy Den Hollander, posing as a delivery person, murdered Anderl at his family’s New Jersey home, targeting Judge Salas. Den Hollander later died by suicide, leaving behind a list of female judges’ information.

“My murdered son’s name is now being attached, weaponized, used as a weapon against these judicial officers,”

Salas said, describing the clear message:

“I know where you live. I know where your kids live. Do you want to end up like Judge Salas? Do you want to end up like her son?”

With a meeting scheduled with the U.S. Marshals Service to address these threats, Salas called the deliveries “unprecedented attacks on judicial officers.”

The pizza doxxing campaign unfolds amid efforts to bolster judicial protections following Anderl’s murder. In 2022, Congress passed the Daniel Anderl Judicial Security and Privacy Act, which restricts the public disclosure and sale of judges’ personal information and provides tools to safeguard their privacy. Supported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, the law aims to prevent the vulnerabilities exploited in the 2020 attack. Yet, these recent incidents reveal that such measures may not fully counter evolving threats.

The coordinated nature of this campaign—targeting judges linked to Trump administration cases—suggests a politically motivated effort to intimidate. By demonstrating knowledge of private addresses and invoking a past act of violence, the perpetrators have sown fear that undermines the judiciary’s ability to operate without retaliation. As investigations continue, the resolution of this campaign remains critical to preserving an independent judiciary, a cornerstone of American democracy.

Wack100 Drops Shocking 2008 Court Docs on DJ Akademiks Involving Nipsey Hussle Case

Wack100 ignited a firestorm by sending DJ Akademiks what he claimed were 2008 court documents related to the late rapper Nipsey Hussle on May 28, 2025. These documents allegedly contain serious charges of sexual misconduct with a minor, including “unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor” and “lewd act on a dependent adult by a caretaker with force.”

However, no credible evidence has emerged to confirm the existence or authenticity of these documents, leaving the claims unverified and under scrutiny.

The allegations surfaced prominently on May 27, 2025, with an X post by the user @Chatnigga101 stating, “Wack100 sends DJ Akademiks alleged 2008 court documents related to Nipsey Hussle, containing serious charges regarding misconduct with a minor.” The post rapidly gained traction, accumulating over 734,000 views and 2,443 favorites.

Another user, @BIGMANSHANE1, reinforced the claim, posting, “Wack100 sends Akademiks some 2008 court paperwork saying Nipsey Hussle was arrested for sex Crimes against a Minor.” Despite the significant online attention, no official records or reputable news outlets have corroborated these assertions.

According to a YouTube video transcript, Wack100 presented the alleged documents to DJ Akademiks as “breaking news,” asserting they were public records from approximately 15 years ago. He claimed the charges also included firearm-related offenses and references to “no contest” pleas on specific counts, suggesting he had long possessed knowledge of this information.

Further investigation into Nipsey Hussle’s legal history yielded similar results. Queries like “Nipsey Hussle 2008 court documents misconduct minor” returned articles about his 2019 murder trial, such as a piece from The Fader detailing unsealed court documents. Still, none mentioned any prior legal issues involving misconduct with a minor. Wikipedia’s entry on Nipsey Hussle notes his 2008 activities, such as releasing mixtapes, with no indication of legal troubles during that period.

The allegations faced swift backlash, with counter-narratives questioning their validity. A YouTube video titled DJ Akademiks Exposes Wack100 for Making Fake Paper alleges that the documents may be fraudulent, accusing Wack100 of “lying on Nipsey Hussle.”

This dispute centers on authenticity and intent. Some view the claims as an attempt to tarnish Hussle’s legacy, while others question the credibility of those involved. The controversy reflects deeper industry tensions over who can speak for deceased artists and how their reputations are handled.

Nipsey Hussle, born Ermias Asghedom, was a prominent rapper who was fatally shot on March 31, 2019, in South Central LA, near the entrance of one of his Marathon Clothing stores. Eric Ronald Holder Jr. shot him at least 10 times, for which he would later be convicted of first-degree murder. The killing was the result of a personal disagreement.

X User
@xuser

A post from X.

Load X Post

Hussle’s professional history featured the occasional minor brushes with the law, like a 2015 arrest for possession of codeine and a misdemeanor charge for interfering with a cop, but nothing of the serious charges now at issue. His passing prompted conspiracy theories surrounding his Dr. Sebi documentary, highlighting how his name had been the subject of speculation for many years.

The controversy surrounding Wack100’s supposed 2008 court papers entwines hip-hop politics, legacy defense, and the difficulty of corroborating assumptions about the past. While Wack100 alleges the papers uncover egregious crimes by the late Nipsey Hussle, allegations of fabrication imply a contrived controversy.

Antoine Massey, the Prison Break Mastermind Linked to Lil Wayne’s Dad, Still Free After New Orleans Jailbreak

During the pre-dawn hours of May 16, 2025, a group of ten inmates pulled off a brazen escape from the Orleans Justice Center in New Orleans, leaving a mocking graffiti: “To Easy LOL” marking the escape. The group was recorded by surveillance cameras as it pulled out a toilet and sink assembly to make an opening for the cell wall, then making a dash for the loading dock out onto the streets of the city. The escape went undetected for about eight hours, making it one of the most dramatic jailbreaks in the recent history of the United States. The incident led to increasing attention to the facility’s security measures and monitoring, uncovering a web of vulnerabilities that permitted such an undetected breach.

At the center of the escape is 33-year-old Antoine Massey, a seasoned escapee with a criminal record. Charged now with kidnapping, rape, domestic assault, and auto theft, Massey has a background of evading custody, successfully escaping in 2007 from a juvenile detention facility, 2019 from Morehouse Parish Detention Facility, and 2023 after cutting off an ankle monitor within a Walmart. His fourth escape solidifies the reputation of Massey as a shrewd and elusive character. His repeated success at evading detention further raises questions about the efficacy of prisoner monitoring and facility protection throughout the U.S. criminal corrections system.

Social media was abuzz with speculation tying Massey’s family to the music culture of New Orleans, including the claim that his stepfather was close friends with Reginald “Rabbit” McDonald, the late stepfather of rapper Lil Wayne. Those claims, based mainly on unverified posts, are not supported by credible sources and do not relate directly to the escape. Those rumors have not been commented on by authorities, which are instead preoccupied with the ongoing manhunt and problems with the jail.

The escape was made possible by the cooperation of Sterling Williams, a maintenance man at the Orleans Justice Center, who was said to be coerced by Massey to shut down the water supply system, which made it possible for the inmates to disassemble plumbing devices undetected. Williams is now in custody, as are more than eleven others, including jail officials and outside conspirators, for assisting the escapees. The escape has put the chronic problems at the Orleans Justice Center, which is under a federal consent decree since 2013 for civil rights violations such as poor prisoner protection and medical care, in the limelight. Recent reports of compliance show that the jail had achieved only 42% of the requirements under the decree, with federal monitors consistently reminding Sheriff Susan Hutson of the lack of adequate supervision of the inmates. The facility’s understaffing and underfunding, as mentioned by Hutson, have further exacerbated the systemic failures that made the escape so easy.

X User
@xuser

A post from X.

Load X Post

Through May 28, 2025, eight of the ten escapees have been recaptured, with Antoine Massey and Derrick Groves, both convicted of second-degree murder, still missing. Massey was seen most recently in Natchez, Mississippi, on May 27, but officials believe he is no longer in the vicinity. A $20,000 reward is offered for the information leading to the apprehension of Massey, and the search is now under way across Louisiana and into Texas, involving federal, state, and regional law enforcement agencies. The sometimes frantic search, which is estimated to be costing the city of New Orleans $250,000 per week, speaks to the difficulty of capturing Massey, believed to have access to financial resources that are facilitating his elusiveness.

Sheriff Susan Hutson has suspended her re-election campaign to focus on restoring public trust, acknowledging the likelihood of inside help in the escape. She also directed an independent review of the jail’s security measures and staffing, which have been labeled as poor. The escape is also prompting calls from city officials and the general public for the resignation of Hutson and an overall reexamination of jail management.

Load YouTube Video

The case has also raised public safety alarms, with some escapee victims said to have gone into hiding out of fear of retaliation. The investigation and prosecution are being handled by the office of the Louisiana Attorney General, Liz Murrill, further spurring criticism of the Orleans Parish Sheriff’s Office.

Load YouTube Video

Cardi B’s New Man Stefon Diggs Spotted Flirting With Women on the Same Boat

Cardi B rose to fame through social media and raw attitude and became a Grammy-winning rapper with hits “WAP” and “I Like It.” Used to keeping it real in her life, she’s no newcomer to the spotlight. Stefon Diggs was born November 29, 1993. He is a popular New England Patriots NFL wide receiver, a former “Minneapolis Miracle” star of the Minnesota Vikings. Unlike Cardi B, Diggs has kept his personal life out of the public eye until recently. The romance, fusing music and sports celebrity status, has been thrilling fans since 2024 rumors started.

The romance rumors started in October 2024, when podcaster DJ Akademiks claimed on his YouTube channel that Cardi B, fresh from her separation from Offset, was dating Diggs. Cardi B dismissed the speculation as “crazy” during an Instagram Live, saying,

“The internet is insane. All these rumors are so crazy. That’s why I don’t want to address it, because this s— is funny”

She chose to let the rumors “ride out,” keeping fans guessing.

In February 2025, the duo was spotted in Miami during Valentine’s Day weekend, entering a hotel hand-in-hand in coordinated outfits. April spotted them attending appearances at Coachella, the Met Gala, and a Manhattan nightclub, openly enjoying PDA. The romance was finalized on May 12, 2025, at a New York Knicks playoff game at Madison Square Garden, where they walked hand-in-hand and indulged in PDA along the side of the court, making it official to the world.

On May 26, 2025, Cardi B and Diggs spent a boat party day out in Miami, but things escalated into controversy when a clip of Diggs getting acquainted with women in a way that was construed by a number of fans to have been flirtatious. The widely shared on X clip captured Cardi B dancing with friends as Diggs chatted with others, eliciting comments like,

“Cardi B’s new beau, NFL star Stefon Diggs, is making a name for himself online by flirting with women on the same boat Cardi B attended ????”

Another person put out the message,

“You can’t go out with Cardi B and do that sort of thing!

Neither Cardi B nor Diggs has addressed the rumors, leaving fans to speculate. Some see the interactions as harmless party behavior, while others question Diggs’ loyalty. The lack of official comment, combined with the viral nature of the clip, highlights how quickly unverified content can spark debate.

Cardi B’s estranged husband, Offset, has not stayed quiet. Following the Knicks game, Offset released a diss track believed to target Diggs, with lyrics mocking his NFL career and suggesting betrayal. “Offset reportedly throws verbal jabs at Diggs, mocking his performance and hinting at betrayal”. Offset’s online activity, with a recent Instagram post of half-naked women, implies that he’s unfazed, but Cardi has leveled the charge of harassment against him, alleging that he also sent lewd videos to Diggs and paid bloggers to tell lies.

Offset’s music and online activity has sparked rumors of unresolved issues from his 2024 breakup with Cardi B, with whom he has three children. Cardi B’s comments on X Spaces in March 2025, accusing Offset of threatening behavior, add further complexity to the narrative.

The boat incident has divided fans on X. Some express disappointment, with posts like,

“NFL star Stefon Diggs got the girls calling him daddy as he enjoy his time on a yacht in Miami with Cardi B”

Others defend the couple, suggesting the video was taken out of context:

“There’s no clear evidence of flirting, and it looks like Diggs and Cardi aren’t taking things seriously and are just having a good time”

Positive reactions include fans celebrating Cardi B’s happiness, with one writing,

“She looks so good n happy go Cardi!”

Diddy Trial Day 10: Ex-Assistant Capricorn Clark Details Abuse, Drug Use, and Polygraph Claims

A chilling silence fell over the courtroom as Capricorn Clark, Sean “Diddy” Combs’ former assistant, recounted a harrowing tale of threats, abuse, and a relentless work environment that pushed her to the brink. On Day 10 of Diddy’s high-profile sex trafficking and racketeering trial in Manhattan federal court, Clark’s emotional testimony painted a disturbing picture of life under the music mogul’s control, leaving jurors gripped by her vivid accounts of violence, coercion, and fear.

Clark, who worked for Diddy from 2004 to 2018, first met him in 2002 through a mutual friend. She joined his team after a headhunter recognized her experience at Def Jam Records, initially serving as an executive assistant before rising to global marketing manager for Sean John and later managing Cassie Ventura’s brand. But her journey was far from glamorous. Clark described a grueling work schedule, often stretching from 7 a.m. to 4 a.m., with no breaks and a modest $65,000 salary. The stress was so intense that she developed alopecia, a condition causing hair loss, which she attributed to the relentless demands of her job.

One of the most shocking moments came when Clark recounted an incident from her first day in 2004. Diddy and a security guard took her to Central Park after 9 p.m., where he allegedly warned her that her prior connection to rival Suge Knight could cost her life.

“If anything happens with Suge, we’ll have to kill you,”

She recalled him saying, setting a terrifying tone for her tenure. Clark also revealed a tense encounter involving 50 Cent, where Diddy, in an elevator with their shared manager Chris Lighty, hinted at violence, saying,

“I don’t like the back and forth, I like guns.”

Clark’s testimony took a darker turn when she described being accused of stealing jewelry borrowed from Jacob the Jeweler in 2004. She was taken to a dilapidated building—later revealed to be a future Bad Boy office—where she was locked in and subjected to five days of polygraph tests. A chain-smoking man,

“five times her size,”

threatened to throw her into New York’s East River if she failed.

“I was petrified,”

Clark told jurors, her voice breaking as she described feeling forced to comply.

The courtroom grew tense as Clark detailed a 2011 incident tied to Cassie Ventura’s relationship with Kid Cudi. She testified that Diddy, enraged after discovering Cassie’s romance, showed up at her Los Angeles apartment at 5 a.m. with a gun, demanding she join him to confront Cudi.

“We’re going to go kill this mother effer,”

She recalled him saying. Clark said she was forced into a car, with Diddy holding a gun on his lap as they drove to Cudi’s home. Diddy and a bodyguard allegedly entered while Clark waited outside, frantically calling Cassie’s burner phone to warn her. When Diddy returned, he grew even angrier, demanding to know who she was contacting.

Clark’s testimony corroborated Kid Cudi’s earlier account of Diddy breaking into his home, locking his dog in a bathroom, and later firebombing his Porsche. She described a high-speed chase where Diddy’s car pursued Cudi, who managed to escape. Later, at Diddy’s rental home, Clark witnessed him violently kick Cassie “at 100% full force” while she curled into a fetal position, crying silently. Clark said she was threatened not to intervene and was forced to walk home. In desperation, she called Cassie’s mother, pleading,

“Please help her. I can’t call the police, but you can.”

Drug use also featured heavily in Clark’s testimony. She confirmed Diddy’s frequent use of ecstasy and said she was asked to procure cocaine for him in 2006 while in the South of France, though she delegated the task to security guards due to her mother’s death from drug-related causes. Clark also obtained prescription drugs in her name for Diddy, who promised to cover the costs. She described cleaning hotel rooms after Diddy’s stays, finding baby oil handprints on walls and floors, corroborating earlier testimony about his “freak off” parties.

Clark’s testimony also touched on a 2006 incident in Miami, where Diddy physically shoved her out of his home after she expressed frustration to his chef. She quit shortly after but returned in 2007 as Sean John’s women’s brand manager, lured by better pay and perks like rent and car payments from Bad Boy. Despite her loyalty, Clark faced further turmoil, including being fired in 2012, allegedly over a vacation request, though she believed it was due to her knowledge of Cassie’s relationship with Cudi.

During cross-examination, Diddy’s attorney Marc Agnifilo questioned Clark’s credibility, pointing to a 2024 meeting where she expressed interest in becoming Diddy’s chief of staff. Agnifilo suggested that the legal troubles might not have occurred if she’d stayed. Clark admitted to the conversation but remained emotional, sobbing as she recounted emails sent to Diddy in 2014 and 2015, pleading for forgiveness after her firing.

The trial, now in its third week, continues to unravel a complex web of allegations against Diddy, who faces charges of racketeering, sex trafficking, and transportation for prostitution. He has pleaded not guilty, with his defense arguing that his actions, while flawed, do not constitute federal crimes.

As Clark’s testimony reverberates, the courtroom braces for more witnesses, including Los Angeles police and fire department officials, to shed light on Diddy’s alleged empire of coercion and violence.

For more on the trial’s explosive moments, check out testimony from Diddy’s former assistant David James and claims of secret meetings with high-profile figures.

Courtesy: Lauren Conlin (Podcaster, Reporter & Host: Pop Culture & True Crime)

Multiple People Shot on Lemon Hill Drive in Philadelphia, Police Respond Late Monday Night

A Memorial Day picnic at Philadelphia’s Fairmount Park was transformed into an act of terror and tragedy when a group of gunman sprayed bullets into a crowd of around 1,000 celebrants, fatally shooting two young adults and wounding nine others, including a group of teenagers. The shooting, which happened around 10:27 p.m. on Lemon Hill Drive, has stunned the city and again fueled debates over gun violence and public safety in the city and the country.

The shooting was in Fairmount Park in Philadelphia, the 800 block of Lemon Hill Drive near Poplar Drive, a public area. On Monday evening, May 26, 2025, at 10:27 p.m., 9th District police officers already on the scene to manage a crowd heard a flurry of gunfire. Police Commissioner Kevin Bethel reported that “a number of rounds” into the crowd found 11 shooting victims, including juveniles. Witnesses described the occurrence of a potential drive-by, with over 75 rounds of gunfire that caused panic, multiple injuries, and several auto accidents when viewers scurried from the area. The quick succession of gunfire implies that at least one of the weapons was equipped with a “switch,” a piece of gear that makes a semi-automatic weapon fully automatic and enables multiple rounds to discharge within a few seconds.

The deceased have been confirmed by the Philadelphia Police to include a 23-year-old woman, Amya Devlin, and a 21-year-old man, Mikhail Bowers. Both of them were declared dead at Penn Presbyterian Medical Center a few moments after the shooting at 10:43 p.m. and 11:07 p.m., respectively. Nine others aged 15 to 28 suffered gunshot wounds and were admitted in stable conditions to nearby hospitals, including the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Temple University Hospital, and Lankenau Medical Center.

Mayor Cherelle Parker denounced the shooting as a “heinous act of violence” that demonstrated

“inhumane disregard for life.”

“We can’t be held hostage by assault-style, war-style weapons. guns with switches,”

she stressed. Police Commissioner Kevin Bethel, speaking to reporters Tuesday morning, confirmed the rapid firing and indicated that police were already in the park dispersing crowds when the shooting happened.

“We know at least one firearm was used that was outfitted with a switch, making it fully automatic,”

Bethel explained, noting the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives involvement due to suspected use of a switch. The shooters themselves escaped police capture, and no weapons have been found.

Through May 27, 2025, the case was still under investigation with no suspects identified or anyone under arrest. The Philadelphia Police are studying surveillance videos, social media activity, and 911 calls for evidence. About 21 shell casings of three different calibers were discovered, which indicated a minimum of three shooters. A crashed Hyundai found near the scene is being examined for potential relevance, though its connection remains unclear. Commissioner Bethel noted the crime scene’s complexity, stating,

“It’s a very large scene. We’ll be here until daylight to capture all evidence”.

He urged the public to provide information, emphasizing,

“We need the community’s help to bring those responsible to justice.”

Philadelphia experienced 91 homicides in 2025, the lowest number since 2014, down by a considerable amount from the 268 homicides that occurred in 2024. While there has been improvement, incidents like the shooting on Lemon Hill remind us of continuing challenges. Nationally, over 120 mass shootings have occurred in 2025, with the Gun Violence Archive reporting 117 as of April 30. Memorial Day weekend was filled with more shootings in Alexandria, Virginia; Chicago, Illinois; and Jackson, Tennessee, highlighting the country’s widespread problem of gun violence.

The shooting has elicited broad shock and dismay, with citizens flooding platforms like X with calls to action and calls for increased gun control. The Twitter account @PhillyCrimeUpd, was one of the first to break the news, raising public interest. The public has raised concerns over the enforcement of permits for large gatherings and the quality of security in public places like Fairmount Park, where public gatherings are often hosted.

“We cannot let our public spaces and parks turn into battlegrounds. It’s time to act before there is any further senseless violence,”

one community organiser said. The preparations are already underway to hold vigils and rallies to remember the victims and to protest against the violence. It represents a community that wants to heal and also avert another tragedy.

Memphis Rapper YNC Trai Slime Arrested for Murder Just Weeks After Surviving Gunshot to the Face

0

The Memphis rap scene is reeling after YNC Trai Slime, a rising star known for his raw talent and street credibility, was arrested on a first-degree murder charge just weeks after surviving a near-fatal shooting. The incident, which also left a six-year-old boy wounded, has sparked intense speculation about revenge and the dangerous intersection of fame and street life in Memphis. As Trai Slime’s bold online posts hint at a motive, his story serves as a stark reminder of how quickly life can spiral in a city where music and violence often collide.

In late March or early April 2025, YNC Trai Slime, whose real name remains undisclosed, was shot in the face at an apartment complex in Memphis, Tennessee. The attack, described as brazen, also injured a six-year-old boy caught in the crossfire. Social media reports, including a YouTube video posted on March 31, 2025, titled “Trai Slime Speaks Out After Getting Shot in Yo Gotti Hood With a Baby,” suggest the shooting took place in a neighborhood linked to local rivalries. Both Trai Slime and the child survived, with the rapper recovering in the hospital, as noted in an April 7, 2025, post about GloRilla facetiming him during his recovery.

Load YouTube Video

Trai Slime took to social media to address the incident, displaying a mix of defiance and bravado. In posts that went viral, he claimed he “cut the bullet out” of his face himself, dismissing doctors as too slow. He used sports metaphors, telling followers to “put your cleats on” and “play ball,” signaling his intent to retaliate.

“Y’all done played with the wrong one. Get back is activated,”

He reportedly said, hinting at a desire for revenge. While these posts resonated with some fans, they may have drawn the attention of law enforcement, who often monitor public figures after such incidents.

The shooting wasn’t Trai Slime’s first brush with violence. Sources indicate he’s faced multiple attempts on his life, cementing his reputation in Memphis as a “shooter” who “doesn’t play around.” The March attack, however, stood out for its recklessness, with shooters firing indiscriminately in a residential area, leaving a young child wounded. While some online reports claim the shooter was apprehended, no official confirmation from the Memphis Police Department or local news outlets supports this, leaving the perpetrator’s identity unclear.

Less than a month later, in May 2025, Trai Slime was arrested and charged with first-degree murder, a development that stunned his growing fanbase. A social media post on May 27, 2025, broke the news, but details about the victim or motive remain scarce. No mainstream outlets, such as the Commercial Appeal or Fox13 Memphis, have reported specifics, and attempts to access police records yielded no results, suggesting the case is either recent or not yet public.

Speculation online points to a possible connection to the March shooting, with some believing Trai Slime sought “get back” against those responsible for the attack. “More than likely, it was somebody tied to that shooting,” one source noted, though this remains unverified.

Trai Slime’s social media activity, where he openly discussed revenge, has fueled theories about his motives.

“You cannot let the fans trick you out to a spot,”

One commentator warned that police closely watch individuals who publicize such intentions. The rapper’s posts, filled with quips about his survival and readiness to “stump” his enemies, may have complicated his legal situation. As he faces serious charges, the lack of clarity about the alleged murder leaves fans and observers piecing together the puzzle.

YNC Trai Slime has emerged as a standout in Memphis’s vibrant hip-hop scene, known for tracks like “Cant Catch Me” and “Playen Wit Me.” His music, blending emotional depth with street narratives, has racked up impressive numbers, with videos garnering a quarter to half a million views in weeks. Collaborations with artists like Pooh Shiesty and Key Glock have boosted his profile, positioning him as a rising star in the Memphis sound, a genre defined by its gritty authenticity.

Beyond music, Trai Slime is tied to the YNC crew, a group some associate with gang activity in Memphis. Online discussions, particularly on Reddit’s r/Memphis10, mention rivalries with groups like 700 WDG and EBG, with one post suggesting a figure named “Baby Walk” claimed involvement in the shooting.

These claims, however, lack verification, and details about the YNC crew’s structure or Trai Slime’s role remain speculative. His reputation as a street figure and his musical success have made him a polarizing figure in a city where fame often comes with danger.

Trai Slime’s story echoes the challenges faced by other Memphis artists, like Young Dolph, whose 2021 murder highlighted the risks of the city’s rap scene. The recent arrest of another rapper, Lil Durk, on a murder-for-hire charge in Florida underscores the broader trend of legal troubles plaguing hip-hop artists. Trai Slime’s rapid rise, marked by viral videos and high-profile collaborations, now hangs in the balance as he navigates serious charges.

With its history of vibrant music and persistent crime, Memphis provides a complex backdrop. Recent reports note a decline in the city’s murder rate in 2024, but incidents like Trai Slime’s shooting highlight ongoing challenges.

TikToker Sparks Outrage After Bragging She’s Ending Her Unborn Baby’s Life

0

A chilling TikTok video has set social media ablaze, showing a user gleefully celebrating an abortion scheduled for May 27, 2025, at 1:40 PM. Posted on X by @libsoftiktok on May 26, 2025, the 13-second clip, captioned “Tiktoker CELEBRATING that she will be killing her own child. This is EVIL,” has exploded with over 629,000 views, igniting fierce debate.

The video shows a person dancing indoors, hands on their stomach, with text overlay reading “abortion is tomorrow at 1:40 .” But the user’s lack of visible pregnancy has sparked questions: Is this real, or a twisted bid for attention? As Generation Z dives deeper into social media’s grip, this incident exposes a troubling trend of chasing viral fame through shocking acts, raising alarms about its impact on young minds, families, and the future.

In the video, the individual, dressed in a black top and patterned shorts, moves casually in front of a plain door and white wall. The text overlay suggests an abortion is imminent, but many X users aren’t buying it. Comments like

“she’s just fat, not pregnant”

and

“this is staged for clout”

flood the post, with some calling it “sickening” while others pray for the alleged child.

Why are young people, especially Gen Z, drawn to such provocative content? Social media platforms like TikTok thrive on short, emotional, and often polarizing videos that hook viewers instantly. With 60% of TikTok users being Gen Z, the app’s algorithm rewards bold, controversial posts, pushing creators to outdo each other for attention. Trends like the “Me Celebrating Because…” challenge, where users flaunt edgy behavior, show how far some will go to stand out. This video, whether real or staged, fits a pattern of “sick trends” where shock value trumps morality, normalizing extreme displays like celebrating abortion to chase likes and followers.

This obsession with viral fame is rewiring how Gen Z processes sensitive issues like abortion. The platform’s design—endless scrolls of emotionally charged clips—encourages impulsive, performative takes over thoughtful reflection. Past incidents, like a 2020 TikTok of teens laughing during an abortion, drew similar backlash, showing a recurring trend of trivializing serious choices.

Experts warn that such content can desensitize young users, eroding empathy and skewing their views on life-altering decisions. For families, this creates a rift: parents and older generations often struggle to understand why their kids glorify such acts online, straining relationships and values at home.

The long-term effects are even graver. Constant exposure to these trends risks shaping a generation that prioritizes clout over consequences. Young people may internalize that sharing personal or fabricated trauma—like an abortion—is just another way to “go viral,” potentially leading to regret or mental health struggles later. For those who follow these influencers, the normalization of such acts could distort their understanding of family planning and responsibility, impacting future relationships and societal views on parenthood.

Studies show that social media can amplify misinformation and emotional manipulation, leaving impressionable teens vulnerable to skewed narratives about reproductive choices.

BREAKING: EBK Affiliate Twan and Phat Boi of Smack Team Shot Dead in Stockton

0

The streets of Central Stockton turned deadly on Memorial Day, May 26, 2025, when a violent shootout claimed the lives of two young men, identified by street sources as Twan, a key figure from 300 Blackgate tied to EBK, and Phat Boi, a member of Conway Crip and Smack Team. I stood at the 300 block of South San Joaquin Street, where the chaos unfolded around 4:45 p.m., the air thick with tension as police cordoned off the scene.

Yellow tape fluttered in the evening breeze, marking the grim reality: two men in their 20s, riddled with gunshot wounds, lay dead on the pavement. The asphalt was stained with blood, shell casings scattered like grim confetti, as homicide detectives worked swiftly to piece together the tragedy that shook Stockton’s hip-hop and street communities.

According to sources close to the scene, Twan from 300 Blackgate got into a bangout with Phat Boi from Conway Crip and Smack Team, and they ended up taking each other out. This wasn’t just a random clash; it was a deadly culmination of bad blood, with both men reportedly pulling triggers in a fierce exchange.

For 300 Blackgate, Twan was a tophat, a respected figure whose loss hits hard. Phat Boi, known in the Conway Crip and Smack Team circles, was equally significant to his crew, making this a double blow to Stockton’s underground scene. The exact spark of this deadly feud remains murky, but whispers on the street point to ongoing gang rivalries that have long plagued the city.

As I surveyed the scene, the weight of Stockton’s gang history hung heavy. EBK, or Every Body Killa, tied to the nightingales and a mix of Bloods and Crips, has been a dominant force in Stockton’s streets, with 300 Blackgate as a key faction. Twan’s affiliation with EBK placed him in a world where loyalty and respect are currency, but so are violence and retribution.

Conway Crip, linked to Phat Boi, is part of Stockton’s complex Crip landscape, while Smack Team, less documented, may be a smaller crew or drug-connected faction, possibly tied to the term “smack” for heroin. Social media posts have fueled speculation, with one circulating phrase stating,

“He was a demon and died on demon time Yk that,”

suggesting a narrative of street justice that resonates in the hip-hop community.

Police have arrested one suspect in connection with the homicide, but details about the individual remain under wraps as the investigation continues. Standing near the crime scene, I saw officers collecting evidence, their faces grim as they navigated a crowd of onlookers, some whispering about revenge, others mourning in silence.

The shooting happened in broad daylight, near Lafayette Street and the Crosstown Freeway, a busy area where families and workers pass through, amplifying the community’s shock. Police moved methodically, bagging shell casings and photographing the scene, while a nearby memorial of candles and balloons began to form, a testament to the lives cut short.

Stockton’s history of gang violence provides context for this tragedy. Operations like Hybrid Havoc in 2022 targeted groups like EBK, Northside Gangster Crips, and others, seizing guns and drugs but failing to stop the cycle of violence. EBK’s reputation for firearms trafficking and homicides has made it a focus for law enforcement, yet the streets remain a battleground.

X User
@xuser

A post from X.

Load X Post

Conway Crip, part of Stockton’s Crip sets like Sutter Street and Northside Gangster Crips, often clashes with rivals, while Smack Team’s role is less clear, possibly a newer or localized crew beefing with groups like Sutter Street Crips. The loss of Twan and Phat Boi, both reportedly tied to Stockton’s rap scene, underscores how deeply gang life intertwines with the city’s hip-hop culture, where lyrics often mirror the pain and pride of the block.

As night fell, the scene grew quieter, but the tension lingered. Community members left flowers and messages, some calling for peace, others hinting at retaliation. The Stockton Police Department urges anyone to contact their crime tip line.

For now, the deaths of Twan and Phat Boi mark a dark chapter for 300 Blackgate, Conway Crip, and Smack Team, leaving fans and families grappling with the cost of a feud that ended in a hail of bullets.

Stay tuned to Hypefresh for updates on this case and its ripple effects in Stockton’s streets and music scene.

Load YouTube Video

Georgia Woman Won’t Face Charges After Fatally Shooting Boyfriend Following Night of Clubbing

A grand jury’s failure to indict Hannah Cobb in the killing of Telvin Osborne has set the stage for debate regarding race, justice, and intimate-partner violence.

On February 23, 2025, tragedy struck in Keysville, Burke County, Georgia, when 30-year-old Telvin Osborne was fatally shot by his 25-year-old girlfriend, Hannah Grace Cobb, at her home on 4 Points Road’s 800 block. Originally billed as a case of a shooting that happened by mistake with the cleaning of a weapon, the case soon became complicated by the introduction of alcohol, a fight, and a claim of self-defense. On May 23, 2025, a grand jury declined to indict Cobb, closing the legal case but fueling heated debate over race, justice, and intimate partner violence.

It happened around 5:45 a.m. on February 23, 2025, after a night of clubbing in Augusta by Cobb and Osborne. The first 911 caller reported that Cobb told him that when she was cleaning or clearing her 9mm pistol, it went off by accident and it struck Osborne in the chest. Osborne, the father of Cobb’s children and an employee at the Savannah River nuclear plant, was pronounced dead at the hospital. The Burke County Sheriff’s Office, led by Sheriff Alfonzo Williams, launched a 48-hour investigation, interviewing friends and family to piece together the events.

Cobb’s first story of a negligent discharge was soon disputed. Sheriff Alfonzo Williams told reporters,

“We found no evidence that the gun was cleaning at the time of the shooting”

The investigation confirmed that Cobb and Osborne were drinking and that there was a fight that occurred over a verbal exchange from Osborne with another female customer at the club. Cobb then reported that a woman approached her with a knife and that, after breaking down the door, Osborne attacked her and that in the ensuing fight, a single shot was fired in self-defense. There were apparently portions of the fight picked up by a ring camera that witnessed Osborne breaking down the door, and law enforcement arrived to find Cobb pressing a tourniquet on the wound to Osborne.

Cobb was detained on February 25, 2025, and booked on a felony count of involuntary manslaughter, a charge that has a potential 10-year sentence in Georgia. A $25,000 bond with level 1 monitoring and surrender of all firearms was granted. The case was brought before a grand jury in Burke County on April 24, 2025. Following a review of evidence presented to them, including the Ring footage and forensic information, the grand jury rendered a finding of “no bill” on May 23, 2025, finding insufficient evidence to pursue charges. District Attorney Jared Williams issued a public statement,

“As the Grand Jury has spoken, the case is closed”

While no future charges are ruled out, no further legal action is presently contemplated.

The grand jury’s decision ignited significant discussion on social media platforms like X, particularly regarding racial dynamics, as Cobb is white and Osborne was Black. Osborne had previously faced criticism for social media posts disparaging Black women while praising white women, which added complexity to public discourse. Some X users alleged that Cobb’s release reflected “white privilege,” citing broader statistics from the U.S. Department of Justice indicating that Black men are 2.5 times more likely to be killed by a partner than white men.

Authorities emphasized that the grand jury’s decision was based on evidence, including the Ring camera footage that corroborated Cobb’s self-defense claim. In response to potential unrest, the Burke County Sheriff’s Office issued a statement urging the community to remain peaceful and respect the legal process.

She Tossed Her Diploma at Her Mom and Lost It All

0

A graduate’s shocking act of throwing her diploma at her mother’s face during a ceremony has gone viral, sparking outrage and costing her a scholarship. The story, buzzing across social media, claims she did it to flaunt her degree while her mom never graduated. But is this tale too wild to be true, and was the punishment fair?

The incident reportedly unfolded at a graduation event, captured in a video that spread like wildfire on platforms like TikTok and X. According to posts, the graduate’s gesture was meant to boast about her achievement, but it backfired when her scholarship was revoked.

If the story is real, it raises tough questions about consequences. As explained in discussions about scholarship rules, many scholarships require students to uphold good conduct. Public disrespect could breach those terms, especially for awards tied to a school’s reputation. But some argue yanking a scholarship over one heated moment is too harsh. Graduation days are emotional, and a single impulsive act might not define someone’s character.

On X, reactions are split. Some users slammed the graduate for disrespect, while others doubt the story, noting the lack of verified details. Past cases, like a student losing a scholarship over a dance video, show how social media can amplify mistakes. Without proof, this feels like a cautionary tale about online narratives.

X User
@xuser

A post from X.

Load X Post

MGK’s New Track Crashes Hard After Viral Internet Criticism Explodes

Machine Gun Kelly released his new song, “Cliché,” on May 23, 2025. The track, which represents a move towards a pop and dance-pop sound with ’80s-era synths, was immediately a subject of contentious debate. While several fans appreciate MGK’s experimentation and commentary on love and stereotypes, others have been anything but positive, calling the song “cringe” or “terrible.”

“Cliché” has sparked diverse responses online that mirror the polarized nature of its reception. While some appreciate MGK’s experimentation with a new sound by highlighting the song’s enjoyable, radio-friendly quality and its playfulness in utilizing stereotypes,

For instance, one fan on X noted that MGK was “making fun of stereotypes and having fun with the release.” Others have praised the track’s emotional depth and nostalgic ’90s vibes, with outlets like Stay Free Radio calling it “fun, emotionally charged, and undeniably catchy.”

However, not all feedback has been positive. Critics have taken to social media and news outlets to express their dissatisfaction, with some branding the song “horrible music” and others criticizing its “watered-down” lyrics. A review from Outkick highlighted the song’s perceived lack of depth, while users on X, such as @OliLondonTV, roasted the music video as “cringe.”

Fan discussions on platforms like Reddit have also been divided, with some arguing that the song’s execution fell short of expectations, even if its intent was lighthearted.

In response to the backlash, MGK has addressed critics directly. He posted a video on social media, scrolling through negative comments, calling out trolls and labeling them “insecure.” In the caption, he wrote,

“Angry insecure dudes are so CLICHÉ,”

turning the criticism into a play on his song’s title. MGK defended his artistic choices by stating, “It’s a pop song, man,”.

MGK’s post-release social media behaviors demonstrate his resiliency. He posted in reaction to being placed on Spotify’s New Music Friday playlist cover and commented on jamming with friends on his birthday. These are indications that he has a good online image and prioritizes his career over getting dragged down by the backlash.

Since “Cliché” came out, MGK has kept in touch with his fans and colleagues, with no signs of a breakdown. Recent sightings by Page Six of his A-list appearances, including flirting with actress Sydney Sweeney, confirmed that he is keeping his momentum going. Posts on his social media, which range from times of enthusiasm to fan engagement, support the image of a healthy, hard-working artist.

Despite the controversy, “Cliché” has attracted popularity and triggered discussions regarding MGK’s artistic growth. The lines in the song that say, “Tell me, would you stay with me?” and “You should run away with me” have sparked rumors that they are inspired by his romance with Megan Fox. The pair welcomed a daughter and have been co-parenting successfully with separate residences.

We use cookies to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. View more
Cookies settings
Accept
Decline
Privacy & Cookie policy
Privacy & Cookies policy
Cookie name Active

Privacy Policy

What information do we collect?

We collect information from you when you register on our site or place an order. When ordering or registering on our site, as appropriate, you may be asked to enter your: name, e-mail address or mailing address.

What do we use your information for?

Any of the information we collect from you may be used in one of the following ways: To personalize your experience (your information helps us to better respond to your individual needs) To improve our website (we continually strive to improve our website offerings based on the information and feedback we receive from you) To improve customer service (your information helps us to more effectively respond to your customer service requests and support needs) To process transactions Your information, whether public or private, will not be sold, exchanged, transferred, or given to any other company for any reason whatsoever, without your consent, other than for the express purpose of delivering the purchased product or service requested. To administer a contest, promotion, survey or other site feature To send periodic emails The email address you provide for order processing, will only be used to send you information and updates pertaining to your order.

How do we protect your information?

We implement a variety of security measures to maintain the safety of your personal information when you place an order or enter, submit, or access your personal information. We offer the use of a secure server. All supplied sensitive/credit information is transmitted via Secure Socket Layer (SSL) technology and then encrypted into our Payment gateway providers database only to be accessible by those authorized with special access rights to such systems, and are required to?keep the information confidential. After a transaction, your private information (credit cards, social security numbers, financials, etc.) will not be kept on file for more than 60 days.

Do we use cookies?

Yes (Cookies are small files that a site or its service provider transfers to your computers hard drive through your Web browser (if you allow) that enables the sites or service providers systems to recognize your browser and capture and remember certain information We use cookies to help us remember and process the items in your shopping cart, understand and save your preferences for future visits, keep track of advertisements and compile aggregate data about site traffic and site interaction so that we can offer better site experiences and tools in the future. We may contract with third-party service providers to assist us in better understanding our site visitors. These service providers are not permitted to use the information collected on our behalf except to help us conduct and improve our business. If you prefer, you can choose to have your computer warn you each time a cookie is being sent, or you can choose to turn off all cookies via your browser settings. Like most websites, if you turn your cookies off, some of our services may not function properly. However, you can still place orders by contacting customer service. Google Analytics We use Google Analytics on our sites for anonymous reporting of site usage and for advertising on the site. If you would like to opt-out of Google Analytics monitoring your behaviour on our sites please use this link (https://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout/)

Do we disclose any information to outside parties?

We do not sell, trade, or otherwise transfer to outside parties your personally identifiable information. This does not include trusted third parties who assist us in operating our website, conducting our business, or servicing you, so long as those parties agree to keep this information confidential. We may also release your information when we believe release is appropriate to comply with the law, enforce our site policies, or protect ours or others rights, property, or safety. However, non-personally identifiable visitor information may be provided to other parties for marketing, advertising, or other uses.

Registration

The minimum information we need to register you is your name, email address and a password. We will ask you more questions for different services, including sales promotions. Unless we say otherwise, you have to answer all the registration questions. We may also ask some other, voluntary questions during registration for certain services (for example, professional networks) so we can gain a clearer understanding of who you are. This also allows us to personalise services for you. To assist us in our marketing, in addition to the data that you provide to us if you register, we may also obtain data from trusted third parties to help us understand what you might be interested in. This ‘profiling’ information is produced from a variety of sources, including publicly available data (such as the electoral roll) or from sources such as surveys and polls where you have given your permission for your data to be shared. You can choose not to have such data shared with the Guardian from these sources by logging into your account and changing the settings in the privacy section. After you have registered, and with your permission, we may send you emails we think may interest you. Newsletters may be personalised based on what you have been reading on theguardian.com. At any time you can decide not to receive these emails and will be able to ‘unsubscribe’. Logging in using social networking credentials If you log-in to our sites using a Facebook log-in, you are granting permission to Facebook to share your user details with us. This will include your name, email address, date of birth and location which will then be used to form a Guardian identity. You can also use your picture from Facebook as part of your profile. This will also allow us and Facebook to share your, networks, user ID and any other information you choose to share according to your Facebook account settings. If you remove the Guardian app from your Facebook settings, we will no longer have access to this information. If you log-in to our sites using a Google log-in, you grant permission to Google to share your user details with us. This will include your name, email address, date of birth, sex and location which we will then use to form a Guardian identity. You may use your picture from Google as part of your profile. This also allows us to share your networks, user ID and any other information you choose to share according to your Google account settings. If you remove the Guardian from your Google settings, we will no longer have access to this information. If you log-in to our sites using a twitter log-in, we receive your avatar (the small picture that appears next to your tweets) and twitter username.

Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act Compliance

We are in compliance with the requirements of COPPA (Childrens Online Privacy Protection Act), we do not collect any information from anyone under 13 years of age. Our website, products and services are all directed to people who are at least 13 years old or older.

Updating your personal information

We offer a ‘My details’ page (also known as Dashboard), where you can update your personal information at any time, and change your marketing preferences. You can get to this page from most pages on the site – simply click on the ‘My details’ link at the top of the screen when you are signed in.

Online Privacy Policy Only

This online privacy policy applies only to information collected through our website and not to information collected offline.

Your Consent

By using our site, you consent to our privacy policy.

Changes to our Privacy Policy

If we decide to change our privacy policy, we will post those changes on this page.
Save settings
Cookies settings