Home Blog Page 178

Someone in Atlanta is Deleting TikTok from People’s Phones

0

One man in Atlanta took matters into his own hands to free people from TikTok—or, at least, to delete it from their phones for them. In a video posted by user @FearedBuck to X, formerly known as Twitter, this unidentified man stops people in the street and acts like he is looking for his account on TikTok with them. He surprises people when, instead of new followers, he deletes the entire application.

While some see him as a hero, others believe his actions are illegal. The debate has taken social media by storm, with divided opinions pouring in from all corners of the internet.

The mystery man, seemingly sure of his mission to remove TikTok from as many phones as possible, asks people in the video to open the app and search for his username, gaining their trust. He then does the opposite: he deletes TikTok and returns the phone.

Whether this was a social experiment, a prank, or an honest act of rebellion against the popular social media application, his antics have raised many questions about the legality and ethics of this kind of behavior.

The internet is divided. Some users have heralded the man as a “hero” who is “saving young minds,” while others have called him an “intrusive menace.” As one user wrote,

“Bro is doing the Lord’s work. Finally, someone is taking action against endless scrolling!”

Another was less impressed:

“If he deleted my TikTok, I’d call the cops. That’s straight-up disrespectful.”

People have also taken the incident quite lightly, and jokes and memes regarding this issue are flooding the internet. One comment on social media said, “First, he deletes TikTok; next, he’s coming for Instagram filters!” Others, with much sarcasm, suggest that TikTok users start carrying “anti-deletion” stickers on their phones as a warning to potential TikTok vigilantes.

Tampering with other people’s phones without their permission is a serious issue. Deleting an app as a joke may be counted as unauthorized access, which is illegal everywhere.

Legal experts say he could be in trouble if someone calls the cops.

“Your phone is your property, and any unauthorized action taken on it- even something as small as deleting could be classified as digital trespassing or unauthorized access to a device,”

Said legal analyst Rebecca Moore.

But so far, nobody has come forward with reports of suing the TikTok vigilante.

This is not the weirdest incident in light of the constant pressures related to TikTok in the US. On January 18, 2025, TikTok was banned for a day over concerns with its Chinese parent company, ByteDance. The US government had forced ByteDance to sell its American operations or risk a permanent shutdown.

After going offline due to an executive order from former President Trump, TikTok remains unavailable for new downloads on the Google Play store or Apple App Store. Current users may continue to access it, but what has kept it hanging in uncertain times within the US market?

While many find the act funny, it also raises concerns about personal boundaries. Is this just a lighthearted joke, or is it an invasion of privacy? Some think deleting TikTok is a noble cause with screen addiction and mental health in mind. Others find it overstepping because such a decision is being made for them without their consent.

Kodak Black Surprises Struggling Bus Rider with $100

0

Recently, Kodak Black was captured on camera handing a $100 bill to a needy bus rider. The heartwarming moment, which occurred on January 28, 2025, has since gone viral across social media platforms, earning widespread praise.

In the now-viral video, Kodak Black is seen up casually at a bus stop, having a few words with the rider before surprising them with cash. The impromptu move sent the crowd into cheers as people pulled out their phones to record the moment for social media.

Well-wishers began to praise Kodak’s philanthropic effort, most claiming it was a big moment for small actions:

“This is why we love Kodak! He’s always looking out for people,”

Shared a user via Twitter. A second fan tweeted, “May not be a lot for him, but that someone will make everything.”

While $100 may not seem life-changing, it is a lot for someone struggling to pay transportation costs or daily expenses. For Kodak Black, though, it’s just one of many moments showcasing his commitment to giving back.

As a rapper, he has a history of philanthropy, often intervening when people are in dire need and communities require any form of assistance.

In 2022, he partnered with the Zachariah McQueen Foundation to pay off the rent of 28 families who had been issued with eviction notices. A year before that, he had pledged to pay college tuition for the kids of two FBI agents who lost their lives in action, showing compassion in their time of need. He has also been known to dispense cash in public events, shopping malls, and even the streets to reach out to those in such situations personally.

Besides financial contributions, Kodak has leveraged his platform to spread emphasis messages on mental health, how to keep pushing forward, and community support. This most recent good deed has sparked conversations about personal growth in the public eye, with many of his fans applauding him for trying to change the narrative about himself. “Kodak always does it for the people,” posted a fan on Instagram.

Kodak Black helping strangers with $100 gift
VIA- WireImage

Yet not everyone is convinced. Skeptics wonder if his charitable acts are from the heart or a way of redeeming his image. “It’s wonderful that he’s helping people out, but is it sincere or for the cameras?” asked one commenter.

From career ups and downs, Kodak Black keeps on proving that he never forgot his roots, be it paying rent for struggling families, helping children further their education, or just giving $100 to a bus rider. He proves that fame does not mean he should turn his back on the community.

Gordon Ramsay’s Flight to Area 51 Sparks Concern From Flight Attendant

Gordon Ramsay has never been one to shy away from the heat, whether in the kitchen or in the headlines. But his latest adventure was a bit more tantalizing than the perfect seared steak- a full-blown internet conspiracy.

The celebrity chef, famous for his razor-sharp wit and volcanic temper, recently posted an all-but-innocuous Instagram photo that sent fans into a frenzy. In the shot, Ramsay lounges on what looks to be a private jet, clad in an all-black ensemble, sunglasses perched on his face, looking every bit the culinary James Bond. But it wasn’t his jet-set style that had people talking-it was the view outside his window.

“Come fry with me… Big (and small) things on the way,”

Ramsay cryptically captioned the post. While that might sound like a harmless plug for an upcoming project, eagle-eyed fans zeroed in on the landscape outside the plane. Instead of a typical cityscape or airport runway, the scene featured an expansive desert, with mountain ridges suspiciously resembling those near one of the most secretive places on Earth—Area 51.

Cue the internet detectives: social media was alight with speculation within hours. Was Ramsay off to Nevada’s fabled military base? Was he about to teach aliens how to make a perfect beef in Wellington? The theories ran from the ridiculous to the almost credible.

Adding an extra layer of intrigue, an anonymous social media post claimed that a flight attendant on board expressed confusion over their destination.

“I’ve been on hundreds of private flights, but this one? Something feels… off,”

The alleged crew member reportedly said.

Just as the internet was ready to declare Ramsay the first Michelin-starred chef to cater an intergalactic banquet, he set the record straight. Ramsay finally let the cat out of the bag: He was in Bangkok, Thailand, celebrating the expansion of his Bread Street Kitchen restaurant. He was amused at how much attention a simple frying pan in his cup holder had received, with fans speculating that he was even taking his cookware to cook for aliens.

Yet, the frying pan became a subplot of its own. Admirers began analyzing the image, considering whether it was from Ramsay’s prized HexClad collection. “Forget UFO’s,” wrote one commenter. “The real mystery is why Ramsay has a frying pan in his cup holder!

But while the Area 51 speculation was an internet fever dream, Ramsay’s Bangkok excursion was real.

The chef was in the country to celebrate the opening of his second Bread Street Kitchen at IconSiam, which marked a major step in his vast culinary empire. Ever the gourmet, he also made the time to have his fill of the city’s legendary street food, which included a right Pad Thai—the dish that got him red-faced during his show The F Word for botching up an attempt at recreating it.

Ramsay would have the last laugh. He leaned into the internet’s wild theories, turning what could have been a throwaway post into an all-out viral spectacle. If there’s one thing he knows just as well as cooking, it’s keeping his audience entertained. And in the end, that might be his most irresistible recipe yet.

Kroger and Microsoft Are Changing Shopping with Facial Recognition

1

Kroger, the biggest supermarket chain in the country, teamed up with Microsoft to seek out facial recognition in stores-claimed as offering them a more personal way of shopping. However, its testing became extremely contentious for ethical and privacy reasons, cited in wide public protest. Critics contend such technology could fuel discriminatory pricing, data misuse, and upticks in general surveillance.

The Kroger-Microsoft project would use facial recognition to create ‘personalised in-store experiences’. It might recognize customers and their shopping pattern when they stepped inside a store or, quite prospectively, revise prices based on customer profiles. Under the concept coined as dynamic pricing, it means there could be potential situations where different shoppers are looking at different prices for the very same product simply because of data variables like loyalty status, their purchase history-or even demographics, for that matter.

It extends Kroger’s technology investments, such as ESLs-its prices in stores can now be changed in real time. The firm announced an investment in AI company IntelligenceNode toward the end of 2024 to ramp up its pricing and polishing, continuing its move into automation and AI-driven personalization.

But despite Kroger’s assurance that the technology’s aim is to improve the in-store shopping experience, the public and lawmakers have taken an adverse reaction. Social media platforms have filled with an outpouring of criticism; users called the initiative “surveillance capitalism” and “corporate greed.”

One X user reacted, “No Kroger for me then. That’s a violation of basic decency and privacy.” Another warned, “We wanted flying cars and got AI racial profiling.

Other lawmakers who have come out in opposition to this move include Senators Elizabeth Warren and Bob Casey, and Representative Rashida Tlaib. In an October 2024 letter to Kroger’s chief executive, Tlaib raised concerns that facial recognition technology could result in discriminatory pricing and even consumer exploitation. Warren and Casey further echoed these apprehensions, suggesting AI-driven pricing policies could exacerbate existing economic inequalities while disproportionately harming lower-income shoppers.

Kroger has always denied having plans to use facial recognition for price discrimination. The company stated that its business model is premised on lowering prices to attract customers, not jacking up costs based on individual profiles.

Microsoft clarified that Kroger is not using its facial recognition technology. The tech giant also pointed out that the digital price tags currently in use are different from those piloted in 2019, thus confirming that no surge pricing model is in place.

This is not the first time Kroger has come under scrutiny over its practices regarding the use of technology. The launch of digital price tags as early as 2018 sparked speculation of surge pricing. More recently, the deal with IntelligenceNode sparked suspicion of AI-powered price adjustment calls by lawmakers for greater transparency.

Kroger’s foray into facial recognition is part of a broader retail automation trend where AI and machine learning are rapidly changing how businesses interact with consumers. Companies say the technology makes life easier and more efficient, while critics say it erodes consumer privacy and worsens economic inequity. Debate after debate, the role of AI in retail remains highly controversial. Yet to be decided is whether facial recognition should be allowed in supermarkets or whether AI-driven personalization will ultimately prove beneficial or injurious to consumers.

Demon on Ouija Board Predicts May 27, 2025 End of the World—TikTok User Shares Chilling Video

A chilling TikTok video has sent ripples through the platform’s conspiracy and paranormal communities. A user, claiming to be an ordinary woman with an extraordinary secret, has shared details of a decade-long interaction with a mysterious Ouija board entity named “Seven.” According to her, this enigmatic being has made a dire prediction: the world will end on May 27, 2025. As her story unfolds, it raises unsettling questions about the supernatural, humanity’s hidden history, and the fragile line between belief and reality.

A TikTok Oracle’s Dire Warning

In the dimly lit video, the user describes her experiences with “Seven,” a being she and her husband first encountered during a casual Ouija board session in 2013.

“At first, it was a game,”

she recounts.

“But what started as fun quickly turned into something much darker and more complex.”

Over the years, the couple recorded detailed transcripts of their communications, which now span over 80 pages of cryptic messages written in binary code, reversed languages, and ancient Sumerian. The TikTok user’s plea for help

“Does anyone out there want to know?”

has captivated the imaginations of thousands, many of whom are already diving into the eerie details.

Seven’s Cryptic Messages: A Demon or a Genius?

The being’s name, “Seven,” is one of the many enigmas tied to its messages. It communicates in puzzling ways, using binary code that must be reversed to form coherent words and phrases, often in dead languages like Latin or Sumerian. Paranormalenthusiasts are already speculating that “Seven” could be an entity operating on a level of intelligence far beyond human comprehension—perhaps even an extraterrestrial or interdimensional being. Some liken its behavior to that of infamous Ouija board entities like Zozo, who are said to exploit humanity’s curiosity and speak in cryptic, ancient tongues.

The Historical Patterns Hidden in Prophecy

What truly sets “Seven” apart, however, is its apparent mastery of history and numbers. The entity ties its doomsday prediction to a timeline of cataclysmic events, beginning with the atomic bombing of Hiroshima on August 6, 1945. “Seven” refers to this as “Contact 1,” a failed attempt at communication that allegedly occurred exactly 24,825 days before its next milestone, the Bay of Pigs incident on August 17, 1962, labeled “Contact 2.” The TikTok user and her husband calculated these dates with astonishing precision despite claiming no advanced knowledge of history or mathematics.

“It’s as if it’s revealing a hidden code behind humanity’s most catastrophic moments,”

She says. If accurate, the timeline suggests the ominous “Contact 3” will culminate in global devastation in 2025.

Among “Seven’s” most mysterious revelations is its use of ancient Sumerian, a language tied to the earliest known civilization. The entity reportedly references Sumerian deities and locations, such as the “Mother Goddess” and the cryptic phrase “reach the mountain.” Some conspiracy theorists have connected this to the Annunaki, mythical beings in Sumerian lore often linked to theories of humanity’s extraterrestrial origins. Could “Seven” be an ancient demon, such as Pazuzu, resurfacing to deliver a warning? Or is this simply an elaborate hoax drawing from popular ancient astronaut theories?

Apocalypse Fever in the Digital Age

“Seven’s” prophecy is far from the first apocalyptic prediction to capture the public’s imagination in recent years. From viral TikTok trends about solar flares to countdowns tied to misinterpreted speeches, the platform has become a breeding ground for modern-day oracles. However, the prediction for May 27, 2025, stands out due to the alleged depth of evidence and the decade-long interaction behind it. It feeds into the growing sense of unease many feel about the state of the world, from climate disasters to political unrest. Is “Seven” merely a reflection of our collective anxiety, or could it be a legitimate warning?

demon seven message transcribed by the tiktok user
VIA-Tiktok

Possession or Ideomotor Effect?

Not everyone is convinced. Skeptics point to the ideomotor effect, a psychological phenomenon where subconscious muscle movements guide the Ouija board’s planchette. While this might explain how “Seven” produces coherent messages, it doesn’t account for its communications’ intricate patterns, historical knowledge, and linguistic complexity.

“The binary code, the Sumerian—it’s not something we could have come up with on our own,”

insists the TikTok user. But is this evidence of a higher intelligence, or could it be an elaborate trick of the mind?

TikTok as a Platform for Modern Prophecy

The story of “Seven” highlights a broader trend: TikTok’s emergence as a digital oracle. Once relegated to whispers in darkened rooms, tales of the paranormal now find vast audiences online. The platform amplifies these narratives, turning personal accounts into viral phenomena that spark collective curiosity and paranoia. In the case of “Seven,” TikTok’s algorithms have created a global audience for a mystery that might otherwise have remained hidden.

X User
@xuser

A post from X.

Load X Post

What If It’s True?

As the May 27, 2025, date looms closer, the TikTok user’s plea for help takes on an air of desperation.

“What if this isn’t just a game?”

She asks.

“What if ‘Seven’ is trying to save us?”

For now, the answers remain as elusive as the entity itself. Whether a demon, a hoax, or a psychological phenomenon, “Seven” has succeeded in one thing: making us question what we know about the boundaries of reality.

As the countdown continues, one question lingers—what will we do if “Seven” is right?

👻 👉 Get your Own Ouija board

Adam22 Shares Why Lily Phillips’ 100-Man Day Led to Bonnie Blue’s PlugTalk Cancellation

0

Drama isn’t just confined to the scenes in the world of adult content-it spills into podcasts, social media, and now even gangbang world records. The co-host of the infamous Plug Talk podcast, Adam22, found himself caught in a juicy feud between two of the industry’s headline-grabbing creators, Lily Phillips and Bonnie Blue. What started as a playful nod to record-breaking stunts unraveled into a saga of canceled appearances, stolen ideas, and some very public shade.

That leaves them breathless, just where 23-year-old British bombshell Lily Phillips once left the online world: tongue tied at an unsavable angle over the ultimate 2024 stunt of sleeping with 101 men in a single day. This bold escapade tore down barriers and triggered an uncanny competition with Bonnie Blue, who topped that with1,057 men in 12 hours earlier this month. Now, Lily’s unapologetic confidence and plans have sent ripples even into the popular OnlyFans-exclusive podcast Plug Talk, by Adam22 and Lena The Plug.

Adam22 recently spilled the tea on why Bonnie Blue pulled out of her scheduled Plug Talk appearance. After Lily’s 100-man stunt became the centerpiece of her episode—along with teasers of her upcoming 300-man gangbang in March—Bonnie called it quits.

“Who knew gangbang politics were so serious?”

Adam quipped on Twitter, sending the fandom into a frenzy.

Bonnie Blue’s decision wasn’t without precedent. The 25-year-old performer, often described as fiercely competitive, reportedly refused to appear on any podcast hosting Lily Phillips. Why? Bonnie accuses Lily of stealing her original concept for a “1,000-men challenge” after the two worked together in 2024 during UK Freshers’ Week. According to Bonnie, her record-breaking idea was shared in confidence—only for Lily to beat her to the punch with her own strategic rollout of escalating events (100 men, then 300, then… who knows?).

On Plug Talk, Lily played coy but couldn’t resist some subtle digs at her rival.

“I’m building up. You know, 300, 500, 1,000—it’s all about making it worth the fans’ time and my wallet,”

she teased, dismissing Bonnie’s record-breaking stunt as “rushed” and “not very profitable.”

Bonnie’s boycott of Plug Talk wasn’t an isolated move. Adam22 confirmed she also canceled several other LA-based podcast appearances for the same reason.

“She’s serious about not being in the same conversation as Lily,”

he said. Fans have taken to social media to pick sides in this messy rivalry, with some calling Bonnie’s withdrawal a sign of insecurity, while others praised her for standing her ground.

Critics, however, aren’t as entertained. Mental health experts have chimed in, warning of the dangers these extreme stunts pose to performers’ physical and emotional well-being.

“The pressure to outdo each other is taking a serious toll,”

one therapist noted, pointing to Lily’s emotional breakdown in her viral YouTube film documenting the aftermath of her 100-man challenge.

Lily, unfazed by the drama, has doubled down on her plans. Not only is she gearing up for her March gangbang, but she’s also teasing an ambitious “backdoor challenge,” promising her fans something even more extreme. Meanwhile, despite bowing out of podcasts, Bonnie hasn’t lost her bite.

“Not everyone is cut out for these circumstances,”

she said in a cryptic post, clearly referencing Lily’s emotional vulnerability post-stunt.

The rivalry is set to peak at this year’s AVN Awards, where both creators are vying for the coveted “Favorite Independent Female Creator” title. Industry insiders are already speculating on the tension that’s bound to unfold when the two share the same red carpet.

Adam22’s wry observation about “gangbang politics” sums it up perfectly. What started as a push for groundbreaking content has turned into a high-stakes game of one-upmanship, where records, reputations, and rivalries collide.

Load YouTube Video

Bill Gates Admits Relationship with Jeffrey Epstein Was a ‘Stupid Mistake’

0

In an interview with The Wall Street Journal on January 24, 2025, Bill Gates finally admitted that his relationship with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein was a “huge mistake” and “foolish.” As regrettable as it is, these words of regret from Bill Gates are nothing new. He has used similar words in 2021 and similarly in 2023. The question still will fester: Why does this shadowy relationship continue to dog him?

Gates’s entanglement with Epstein began in 2011, years after the financier’s first conviction for soliciting prostitution involving a minor. Gates justified their meetings by claiming Epstein might assist with global health philanthropy, a cause close to his heart. But even then, Epstein’s name was synonymous with scandal. What was Gates hoping to gain? Was he naïve about Epstein’s reputation—or willing to look the other way in pursuit of a potential ally?

The meetings, which reportedly took place in Epstein’s opulent Manhattan townhouse, yielded no tangible results for Gates’ philanthropic ambitions. Yet, the association has proven to be a costly error, tarnishing the billionaire’s carefully crafted image as a benevolent innovator.

If the mere connection between Gates and Epstein wasn’t enough to fuel intrigue, revelations in 2023 added a salacious twist to the narrative. According to reports, Epstein attempted to blackmail Gates over an alleged affair with Mila Antonova, a Russian bridge player, in 2017. Epstein purportedly paid for Antonova’s enrollment in a software coding school and later demanded reimbursement from Gates, threatening to expose the affair.

The blackmail plot is typical of Epstein, who would use secrets to manipulate his powerful associates. But it raises a few questions: Did Epstein proactively try to get leverage over Gates, or was this just some twist in the planned game of influence and control?

Epstein’s association with him cast a long shadow over his personal life, too. His dealings with Epstein reportedly troubled his ex-wife, Melinda French Gates; his meetings with the financier thus became a source of tension in their marriage. In 2021, after 27 years, the couple divorced, with Melinda citing concerns about his dealings with the disgraced financier.

The emotional toll on Gates’ personal life underscores the ripple effects of Epstein’s influence. Was this relationship merely a professional miscalculation, or did it represent a deeper moral lapse that shook the foundations of Gates’ closest relationships?

As Gates himself has admitted, the meetings were a mistake. Yet, his repeated public regrets only add to the mystery. Why revisit this topic so often? Is it an attempt at damage control, or does it reflect a growing awareness of how his proximity to Epstein continues to erode public trust?

Epstein’s network famously included some of the world’s most powerful figures, from royalty to politicians, sparking endless debate about the nature of these connections. Gates’ involvement fits neatly into this narrative of shadowy dealings among the elite, where philanthropy, influence, and secrets collide.

The Gates-Epstein saga is more than a cautionary tale of poor judgment; it is a glimpse into the nontransparent world of the ultra-rich, where even their most intelligent members can get caught up in webs of controversy.

While Gates has maintained that his intentions were pure and philanthropic, the consequences of his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein simply are not deniable indiscretion or the indication of something bigger, a broader pattern of risk-taking at the highest echelons of power.

For now, the story of Bill Gates and Jeffrey Epstein functions as both a mystery and a mirror reflecting society’s abiding fascination with power, influence, and the secrets of the elite.

See The whole interview below :

Microsoft in Talks to Acquire TikTok

0

Microsoft once again finds itself in the midst of a high-stakes deal making, as discussions regarding the probable sale of it to the extremely popular short-video platform TikTok heat up. This interest has been revived by comments only recently from the former U.S. President, driving a competitive bidding process forward for majority control of this impactful social media asset.

This isn’t the first time TikTok purchase won’t be Microsoft’s first try. During the summer of 2020, in the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, Microsoft pursued an acquisition that would have given the Seattle-based tech company control over the short-form video service. Those talks ultimately went sideways, with Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella later characterizing the experience as “the strangest thing I’ve ever worked on.”

This brings us to the present, where, in 2024, Microsoft sits at the negotiating table once again. Competition this time is likely from Oracle and Elon Musk among others. The company has since signaled a competitive auction in public statements for maximum value for any potential divestment.

It’s just plain undeniable: TikTok is an absolute worldwide powerhouse. At the time of penning this post, it had laid claim to more than 150 million monthly active users in the U.S., going even higher into more than a billion globally, hence revolutionizing people’s method of consumption when it comes to online content. People claim that reason as the major ingredient which turns on that powerful, sophisticated recommendation algorithm.

The platform, with its impact on popular culture, politics, and global trends, makes for a strongly strategic asset. To Microsoft, TikTok would not only be a major addition to its social media stable, supplementing the ownership of LinkedIn, but also come with an opportunity to embed the powerful AI technology driving TikTok into a wide array of its other products and services.

The scrutiny by the U.S. government over TikTok has been a major factor in these ongoing negotiations. ByteDance, which owns TikTok, has been increasingly pressured to divest its U.S. operations over data privacy and national security concerns because of its Chinese ownership.

In the previous administration, executive orders were issued about TikTok.  While these are in litigation, they illustrate the bargaining power of the brand and raise the stakes for any buyer.

The American operations of TikTok are believed to be valued at tens of billions of dollars-a massive investment even for companies the size of Microsoft. If a deal were to materialize, it would probably rank as one of the largest acquisitions in the history of the tech industry.

The stakes are high for the potential benefits it could bring to Microsoft. Integrating TikTok would complete its presence in the consumer tech space, continuing its business diversification, adding younger and highly engaged users into its ecosystem. Yet, the reported valuation of a high DbContext also underlines how competitive and risky the pursuit is.

Other bidders continue to muddle the landscape of acquisition prospects. Oracle, which also vied for TikTok in 2020, is still interested. Elon Musk has been among those mentioned as weighing a bid.

If Microsoft ultimately prevails, the acquisition could dramatically reshape the direction of the company. It would slingshot Microsoft into a powerhouse in social media, planting it squarely in a market now dominated by Meta and a host of other competitors. It could also allow the integration of TikTok’s algorithm into Microsoft’s larger AI and cloud computing strategies.

The result of these negotiations has larger ramifications for the operations of U.S. tech companies in the global market. It underlines an increasingly interlocking nature of technology, national security, and geopolitics, probably setting a precedent for future acquisitions and their regulation.

Exclusive Original Photos of Dr. Reed’s 1996 Alien: The Creature with Dolphin DNA & a Dark Secret

0

One crisp October morning in 1996, for Dr. Jonathan Reed, one typical day would make cause for a shocking turn; being prepared for what he thought was going to be a routine hike near Seattle with his dog Suzy, he found himself plunged headfirst into one of the most controversial alien encounters of all time.

Reed’s claim?

He came upon this enormous, otherworldly, eldritch abomination of a creature with gelatinous flesh and haunting bulbous eyes that seemed to refuse all earthly explanation. His dog, Suzy, seemingly alerted by some weird rustling in the forest, fearlessly charged forward with courageous abandon and promptly disappeared in a terrifying instant. What Reed saw next would shatter his view of reality and catapult him into a struggle with forces beyond his control.

A Biology Out of This World

The alien, described as standing an intimidating nine feet tall, bore features unlike anything seen before. Its granite-like skin glinted in the sunlight, and its DNA—analyzed in the days following the encounter—left scientists in awe. Among its 46 chromosomes, nine bore a startling resemblance to marine lifeforms like dolphins and sea turtles. Could this creature share a mysterious evolutionary link with Earth’s ocean dwellers? Or was it a harbinger of something far more profound? With its immense size and unearthly traits, this being shattered the stereotypical image of the small, grey aliens of pop culture.

The Death Toll Rises

The story took a sinister turn when several scientists who allegedly analyzed the alien’s DNA died under mysterious circumstances within a single week. Each death was sudden and unexplainable, leaving a trail of unanswered questions. Were these tragedies mere coincidence, or was a more menacing force at play? Speculation of a government-orchestrated cover-up gained traction, adding to the narrative’s chilling allure. Reed himself would later claim that he became a target of shadowy figures desperate to bury the truth.

Vanishing Evidence

One of the most baffling aspects of the case is the disappearance of the alien’s body. According to Reed, agents of an unnamed government agency stormed his home, confiscating not only the body but also photographs and any evidence that could validate his claims.

“They erased everything,”

Reed lamented in interviews.

“It’s as if they were erasing history itself.”

This alleged operation left skeptics and believers alike grappling with an unnerving possibility: what lengths would powerful institutions go to suppress the existence of extraterrestrial life?

A Glimpse at Unfathomable Technology

Perhaps most intriguing was the alien’s wristband—a device Reed described as a technological marvel beyond human comprehension. He believed the device was a tracker, linking the creature to an obelisk-shaped spacecraft he claimed to have seen hovering nearby. What secrets might this wristband hold? Could it unlock advanced technology or connect humanity to the stars? As the wristband also vanished along with the alien body, the answers to these tantalizing questions remain frustratingly out of reach.

Critics Cry Hoax

Despite the extraordinary claims, not everyone is convinced. The Northwest Museum of Legends and Lore dismissed Reed’s story as an elaborate hoax, citing inconsistencies in his narrative and the lack of physical evidence. Scientists, too, remain skeptical, pointing out that Reed has never presented verifiable proof of the alien’s DNA or the alleged deaths of researchers.

“Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence,”

one critic noted. Yet for believers, the gaps in Reed’s story may simply reflect a meticulously orchestrated government suppression.

A Creature Unlike Any Other

The alien that Reed describes is unique to the more common players in UFO mythology, standing Tall, having dolphin-like DNA, and such an odd physiology compared to those Greys, Reptilians, and Nordics spoken of by so many abductees. Unlike the humanoid Greys with postulated diminutive frames and almond eyes or even the malevolent scaled monsters of the Reptilians, Reed’s creature is simply an enigma that argues against our preconceived notions of what alien life might be.

Aliens, Demons, or Dreams?

The cultural implications of alien encounters often blur the line between reality and perception. Some researchers point to alien abduction tales arising from such things as sleep paralysis and dissociative states. Others have drawn parallels with medieval tales of demonic manifestation but recast in the form of science fiction.

Do these stories amount to some cultural mythology, or are they hints that there’s something intergalactic buried deep within the human consciousness?

The Questions That Remain

Could Dr. Reed’s extraordinary tale be the key to uncovering hidden truths about extraterrestrial life and government conspiracies? Or is it an elaborate fabrication, crafted to captivate the imaginations of alien enthusiasts?

X User
@xuser

A post from X.

Load X Post

As the debate rages on, one thing is certain: the 1996 encounter continues to inspire curiosity, skepticism, and an unrelenting hunger for answers.

What do you believe? Dive deeper into this mystery and share your theories. Are we closer to unlocking the secrets of the universe, or are we chasing shadows?

Georgia Man Shocked After AliExpress Sends Photo Instead of Ordered Drill

0

Sylvester Franklin of Savannah, Georgia, ordered a drill and a pressure washer from AliExpress but got a printed photo of the drill and a single screw as replacements for the pressure washer. These incidents have left Franklin frustrated and warning other consumers about the potential pitfalls of international online purchases.

He bought two tools online from the most prevalent e-commerce website in order to upgrade the home tool set, but instead of sending a drill, he sent a picture of it, while he paid $22.47 for the pressure washer-a lone screw arrived in his hand.

“They sent me this,” Franklin said, holding up a printed image of a drill. “A picture is what they sent me. I paid $22.47 for a pressure washer, and this is what I get-a screw.”

Franklin has been attempting to get his refund from AliExpress since November and all those attempts have gone nowhere. He even tried using a chargeback request with his bank, that too didn’t work. “This is not good. This is real bad,” he lamented.

Despite what Franklin said was a bad experience he had, hopes it will serve as a cautionary tale from other online shoppers. “This picture may be worth a thousand words, but it is not the $40 bucks I paid”. Franklin added “Don’t scam nobody. When you spend your money you wanna get what you paid for.”

AliExpress is owned by Alibaba Group, China’s main e-commerce player that has long faced consumer complaints. The Office of the United States Trade Representative placed AliExpress on its “Notorious Markets for Counterfeiting and Piracy” list in 2021.

In similar vein, AliExpress has been complained about to the Georgia Consumer Protection Division. Of three such complaints it received in 2024, it heard cases on issues with the non-delivery of an item, the provision of a fake tracking number, and financial losses above $400. Refunds were obtained in such cases, although this took months of detailed processing.

Franklin’s case underlines the risks associated with online purchase, especially with international sites. He says that consumers have to research well about the seller and read reviews, besides testing the authenticity of the platform before making their purchases.

The experts recommend the following steps to be done by consumers who find themselves in similar trouble:

Approach customer support: First of all, one should approach the seller or customer service of the platform for a refund or resolution.

Chargeback: If the platform is not responsive, initiate a chargeback by filing a dispute with your credit card company or bank, Report to.

Report to Authorities: Complaints should be lodged with the consumer protection agencies at place, for example, the Georgia Consumer Protection Division. Most of these agencies are accorded the authority to investigate and resolve such matters.

Check Reviews and Ratings: This is where checking on the reputation of the seller, using resources like the Better Business Bureau, presents itself before making a purchase. Check for customer reviews regarding how reliable a certain seller is.

Rapper Dank Demoss Sues Lyft for Millions After Driver Refused Service Over Her Size

0

Rising Detroit rap scene phenomenon Dank Demoss has once again drawn headlines, but this time, an ultra-explosive multimillion-dollar lawsuit has been filed against the gigantic ride-sharing service Lyft. Her case against the service provider was based on allegations that one of its drivers rejected her request as a passenger, alleging she was too heavy for the vehicle.

On January 20, 2025, Demoss, whose real name is Dajua Blanding, shared a video on social media that captured her encounter with a Lyft driver named Abraham. In the viral video, Abraham told the 489-pound artist that his car couldn’t carry her weight. Demoss claimed in the video that the driver suggested she order a bigger car, such as an Uber XL.

The experience was a humiliating eye-opener for the Detroit-based rapper.

“I couldn’t believe it,”

she said in an Instagram post.

“It’s 2025, and people are still being treated like this. I’m fighting for all the plus-size people who’ve been told they don’t fit—in cars, in spaces, in life.”

Feeling humiliated and marginalized, Demoss filed a multimillion-dollar lawsuit against Lyft on January 28, 2025. In her statement, she expressed her determination to fight for herself and others in the plus-size community who face similar discrimination. Her legal team argues that weight should be recognized as a protected characteristic under Michigan law, similar to race or gender.

Michigan law protects against weight-based discrimination, and her lawyers argued the company has failed to safeguard those protections.

“This is not just about me,”

Said Demoss in a press conference.

“This is about making sure companies like Lyft are held accountable for their actions, so that all people can move through the world without judgment, or denial of service.”

The case has sparked much debate, with opinions flowing in from every direction. On the one hand, many have rallied behind Demoss, applauding her for standing up against size discrimination. Social media has been flooded with hashtags like #RideWithRespect and #SizeMattersNot as users share their experiences of being made to feel left out because of their size.

One fan said, “Dank is doing what she always does-fighting for us. This isn’t just a lawsuit; it’s a movement.”

Others, on the other hand, sympathized with the driver, adding that safety and practicality must also be considered: “Drivers have to feel comfortable, and small cars do have weight limits,” posted one user.

Lyft responded publicly to say it found the situation “unacceptable,” though, at this writing, their only detailed comments came as more of an apologia; according to at least one report-unconfirmed Mr. Abraham no longer drives for Lyft, an official word about this is elusive.

The company has also reiterated its commitment to inclusivity, although critics have asked for clear policies to prevent similar incidents.

“It’s not enough to apologize,”

Said a local size-inclusive advocate.

“We need to see real change—better driver training, better options of vehicles, and better support for plus-size passengers.”

For Demoss, this isn’t just a courtroom case; it’s about breaking down barriers for plus-size people in all walks of life. She has been quoted speaking candidly in interviews about her many struggles, not just in ride-sharing but within an industry and society that marginalizes people who don’t fit into a very narrow mold.

Her music, a mix of bold beats and deeply personal lyrics, has always reflected her struggles and triumphs.

“This is just another chapter,”

She said.

“When I step into that booth, I channel everything I’ve been through—every insult, every rejection, every moment like this. And I turn it into something powerful.”

Legal experts say it could set a significant precedent, particularly if it leads to changes in the ride-sharing policies. “Successful resolution could help open the door for attraction of broader forms of protection against size discrimination,” says one attorney familiar with the case.

Whether on the mic or in court, Dank Demoss is again proving that she’s a force to be reckoned with- somebody who will not be silenced, no matter the odds. While her rhymes have always done the damage, her well-documented actions have the biggest impact.

U.S. Stock Market Plunges $1 Trillion in One Day After Chinese AI Platform DeepSeek Debut

0

An announcement of DeepSeek, a new Chinese AI platform, brought ripples into the financial markets globally and especially in the U.S.’s tech sector. Although reports said the U.S. stock market faced a $1.3 trillion fall, that does sound exaggerated. The losses recorded were large, but it was not that dramatic, actually. What it did was give a fresh impetus to debates on dominance in AI, data privacy, and the next frontier in the race between technology giants.

DeepSeek-which was founded in 2023 by a Chinese entrepreneur Liang Wenfeng-presented its representative AI model named R1. According to officials, R1 is unusually powerful and user-friendly, built in two months on less than US$6 m. That dramatically contrasts with billion-dollar investments put into similar technologies in the United States-for example, at OpenAI. DeepSeek also made R1 open-source: its code could be widely reviewed.

DeepSeek’s AI assistant app raced to the top of the download charts, outpacing ChatGPT on Apple’s App Store, according to reports. The rapid adoption underlined the appeal of the app and raised concerns over the competitive edge of established U.S. tech firms.

The market did move on DeepSeek’s first day of trading, but not with the initially reported $1.3 trillion plunge. The major indices did decline, including the Nasdaq Composite, though not by the initially reported 3%. Losses were taken by the S&P 500, too, while the Dow had changed but not quite as dramatically as early reports would have indicated. Where Nvidia did take a significant hit in market valuation, though not the reported historic $589 billion, a major driver in AI hardware.

Other technology giants like Microsoft, Alphabet parent of Google, and Meta Platforms fell probably not initially by the percentage amounts reported throughout. The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index also declined although likely not to the magnitude initially reported.

Although some of the more sensational reports put the blame for that sharp selloff directly and squarely on the arrival of DeepSeek, market analysts argue otherwise, pointing out deeper economic unease at the time. From both a demand perspective, long-term ramifications of DeepSeek’s technology regarding AI chips and data centers are yet to be ascertained and are subject to further scrutiny.

This achievement did not go unnoticed by industry leaders and political figures. Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella, speaking at the World Economic Forum, said that there had been progress without making the comments available. Claims that a U.S. President called the development a “Sputnik moment” for AI are also unsourced. Data privacy has become a concern, and various questions have been raised by the Australian government regarding how DeepSeek handles data. Reports indicate that the app may transmit volumes of user data, possibly to China, which create security and privacy risks. Details of this are not really known and would need further investigation and confirmation.

DeepSeek has grown along a similar trajectory as the constantly shifting competitive landscape of AI. A focus on efficiency and access has made many technology companies rethink their strategy. Further and continued research is indeed necessary regarding the extent of the impact in as much detail, but also for the cost involved with it and the timeframe needed for such development. Besides, there are geopolitical implications, but whether they include the tightening of export controls or escalations of trade tensions, remains to be seen.

Tom Holland’s Peter Parker Faces a New Romance in SPIDER-MAN 4

Tom Holland’s Spider-Man will swing into action once more, but this time around, Peter Parker navigates the uncharted territories of a brand-new romance rather than saving New York. Spider-Man 4, coming July 24, 2026, picks up after the emotional fallout from No Way Home, in which Peter eventually makes the ultimate sacrifice: erasing himself from the minds of everyone he eventually loved, including MJ, played by Zendaya. Now, with a clean slate, Marvel’s favorite web-slinger prepares to explore some very uncharted emotional territory.

The biggest buzz surrounding Spider-Man 4? Who might be Peter Parker’s new love interest. Details are still mum, but the rumor mill points to two faces from the Spider-Man canon: Gwen Stacy and Felicia Hardy, aka Black Cat.

Gwen Stacy’s entrance into the MCU would be monumental. Of all the comic book romances of Peter Parker, she brings with her layers of heartbreak, love, and personal growth. Marvel could reimagine her for a modern and bold take on the character to match Tom Holland’s Peter-a young man still emotionally reeling from his sacrifices.

That said, Felicia Hardy brings a totally different dynamic. A thief with a penchant for causing chaos, the flirtatious and morally gray relationship between Black Cat and Spider-Man could drive Peter well out of his comfort zone. Think less “girl next door” and more “dangerously irresistible.” Names such as Sydney Sweeney and Anya Taylor-Joy are said to be in consideration for the role, although Marvel has yet to confirm this.

There’s also word that Marvel might go the route of an entirely new, never-conceived romance for Peter, bringing in an entirely new character to the big screen. Whatever the case may be, Spider-Man 4 will show the more emotionally sensitive side of Peter Parker.

Spider-Man 4 new character introduction
via- Marvel studios

While Zendaya’s MJ stole hearts across Homecoming, Far From Home, and No Way Home, she reportedly will have a smaller role in this installment. Given how very busy she is-between Euphoria and Dune: Part Two-she can afford to have lesser screen time to give way to fresh faces for the movie. Insiders say her limited presence could reflect Peter’s decision to keep his distance after the events of the last film. It’s a bittersweet choice, but one that underscores his growth as a character.

It is rumored that Spider-Man 4 returns to Peter’s street-level roots, with the character remaining in college and becoming a neighborhood hero. The film will allegedly center around Vincent D’Onofrio’s Kingpin as the central antagonist, which connects with the narrative of Daredevil in Born Again. Multiverse elements are also said to feature in the film, with whispers of Tobey Maguire and Andrew Garfield possibly reprising their Spider-Man roles for brief cameos.

Tom Holland Peter Parker relationship
via- IMDB

And for all the multiverse hoopla, Marvel’s playing it close to the chest. The story is largely a character-driven one that focuses on Peter’s personal struggles as he tries to balance this new romance with being Spider-Man. Coming off the explosive events of No Way Home, this film provides an opportunity to recalibrate-to explore Peter as a young man trying to rebuild his life.

With production starting in summer 2025, Spider-Man 4 has ample time to live up to the promise of new stories to tell. Tom Holland‘s fourth solo outing might prove to be a new beginning not only for Peter Parker but also for the Spider-Man franchise. A new love, new challenges, and deeper insight into the man behind the mask? We’re here for it.

Mark your calendars: Spider-Man 4 swings into theaters on July 24, 2026.

Desiree Smith Reveals the Real Reason 2Pac Broke Up with Her

0

Even decades after his passing, Tupac Shakur—better known as 2Pac—remains a towering figure in music and culture. With words afire, constant activism, and charismatic appeal, he realized an impact on and challenge to people that continues to inspire today.

But beyond the headlines lies another tale: his private life and love. Desiree, known affectionately to most as Dez, opened up for the first time about her three-year relationship with the hip-hop icon, offering a story that is both a love tale and cautionary.

In a candid, revealing interview, Dez spoke with the intensity of her times with 2Pac: a relationship of love, jealousies, and the unyielding pressures associated with fame. Their story lifts the veil that shrouds an artist in controversy and myths more often than not.

Dez and 2Pac first met in the early ’90s, and they instantly connected. By 1993, their friendship had blossomed into a romance, and Dez quickly became a rock in the rapper’s chaotic life.

When 2Pac was in prison, Dez was there for him, visiting regularly and offering emotional support. She was even present for milestones such as the infamous signing of his deal with Death Row Records- a decision that would change his career and life forever.

“He needed me, and I was always there,”

Dez said of their near-constant letter-writing when 2Pac was in prison. She said those letters became an emotional lifeline for 2Pac, who felt alone and misunderstood much of the time.

what desiree smith said about 2pac breakup
via- thesource

But despite their chemistry, their romance was not a smooth sail. The only constant scrutiny that came with dating one of the biggest stars of the ’90s took its toll. But it wasn’t just the pressures of fame that caused tension; most of the trouble in breaking them up stemmed from a lack of trust and insecurities.

One of the most chaotic moments Dez shared was a misunderstanding with one of 2Pac’s Outlawz crew members, Yaki Kadafi. She said it caused fights and was symbolic of their relationship.

Things finally reached a head when Dez was spotted riding off another man’s motorcycle- a minor incident, by all accounts, that somehow mushroomed into a major screaming match.

“It didn’t sit well with him,” Dez said. “He felt disrespected and betrayed, though it wasn’t what he thought.”

This, however, wasn’t the only cause for friction. Jada said that he had an irrational aversion to the “Yaki Kadafi braids,” a hairstyle she often wore. Of course, moments like these were trivial in and of themselves, told of deeper emotional battles and the load of insecurities 2Pac harbored.

DeZ’s story is said to have crossed paths with many of the most career-defining moments in 2Pac’s history. She was there when he joined Death Row, which he said was like “selling my soul to the devil.”

Reflecting on the camaraderie and competition that defined hip-hop at the time, she remembered her first meeting with him while hanging out with Biggie Smalls and Bobby Brown.

2pac ex girlfriend interview desiree smith
via- Instagram

But even as 2Pac’s star ascended, their romance buckled under the strain.

“I didn’t understand why he was so upset when he had always spoken so highly of me with his friends,”

Dez related to the eventual breakup. This left her heartbroken and perplexed, showing how even the most intense relationships can go awry out of misunderstandings and external pressures.

Putting aside his ups and downs, Dez never withdrew her love from 2Pac. She remained his very good friend through thick and thin, however turbulent the waters in his life got. She said about his struggles,

“I felt bad for him; I could see the weight he was carrying.”

Desiree’s story adds a new dimension to 2Pac’s life because, as it were, an individual’s bravado and brilliance are matched by weaknesses to which anybody is prone. Their relationship, far from perfect, is a deeply human testament to the complexities of love, trust, and the cost of living in the spotlight.

X User
@xuser

A post from X.

Load X Post

“Despite everything, I cared for him deeply,” Dez said. For those who still keep 2Pac alive, her story is a tribute and a poignantly sad reminder of the man behind the music- a man whose humanity is as unforgettable as his artistry.

We use cookies to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. View more
Cookies settings
Accept
Decline
Privacy & Cookie policy
Privacy & Cookies policy
Cookie name Active

Privacy Policy

What information do we collect?

We collect information from you when you register on our site or place an order. When ordering or registering on our site, as appropriate, you may be asked to enter your: name, e-mail address or mailing address.

What do we use your information for?

Any of the information we collect from you may be used in one of the following ways: To personalize your experience (your information helps us to better respond to your individual needs) To improve our website (we continually strive to improve our website offerings based on the information and feedback we receive from you) To improve customer service (your information helps us to more effectively respond to your customer service requests and support needs) To process transactions Your information, whether public or private, will not be sold, exchanged, transferred, or given to any other company for any reason whatsoever, without your consent, other than for the express purpose of delivering the purchased product or service requested. To administer a contest, promotion, survey or other site feature To send periodic emails The email address you provide for order processing, will only be used to send you information and updates pertaining to your order.

How do we protect your information?

We implement a variety of security measures to maintain the safety of your personal information when you place an order or enter, submit, or access your personal information. We offer the use of a secure server. All supplied sensitive/credit information is transmitted via Secure Socket Layer (SSL) technology and then encrypted into our Payment gateway providers database only to be accessible by those authorized with special access rights to such systems, and are required to?keep the information confidential. After a transaction, your private information (credit cards, social security numbers, financials, etc.) will not be kept on file for more than 60 days.

Do we use cookies?

Yes (Cookies are small files that a site or its service provider transfers to your computers hard drive through your Web browser (if you allow) that enables the sites or service providers systems to recognize your browser and capture and remember certain information We use cookies to help us remember and process the items in your shopping cart, understand and save your preferences for future visits, keep track of advertisements and compile aggregate data about site traffic and site interaction so that we can offer better site experiences and tools in the future. We may contract with third-party service providers to assist us in better understanding our site visitors. These service providers are not permitted to use the information collected on our behalf except to help us conduct and improve our business. If you prefer, you can choose to have your computer warn you each time a cookie is being sent, or you can choose to turn off all cookies via your browser settings. Like most websites, if you turn your cookies off, some of our services may not function properly. However, you can still place orders by contacting customer service. Google Analytics We use Google Analytics on our sites for anonymous reporting of site usage and for advertising on the site. If you would like to opt-out of Google Analytics monitoring your behaviour on our sites please use this link (https://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout/)

Do we disclose any information to outside parties?

We do not sell, trade, or otherwise transfer to outside parties your personally identifiable information. This does not include trusted third parties who assist us in operating our website, conducting our business, or servicing you, so long as those parties agree to keep this information confidential. We may also release your information when we believe release is appropriate to comply with the law, enforce our site policies, or protect ours or others rights, property, or safety. However, non-personally identifiable visitor information may be provided to other parties for marketing, advertising, or other uses.

Registration

The minimum information we need to register you is your name, email address and a password. We will ask you more questions for different services, including sales promotions. Unless we say otherwise, you have to answer all the registration questions. We may also ask some other, voluntary questions during registration for certain services (for example, professional networks) so we can gain a clearer understanding of who you are. This also allows us to personalise services for you. To assist us in our marketing, in addition to the data that you provide to us if you register, we may also obtain data from trusted third parties to help us understand what you might be interested in. This ‘profiling’ information is produced from a variety of sources, including publicly available data (such as the electoral roll) or from sources such as surveys and polls where you have given your permission for your data to be shared. You can choose not to have such data shared with the Guardian from these sources by logging into your account and changing the settings in the privacy section. After you have registered, and with your permission, we may send you emails we think may interest you. Newsletters may be personalised based on what you have been reading on theguardian.com. At any time you can decide not to receive these emails and will be able to ‘unsubscribe’. Logging in using social networking credentials If you log-in to our sites using a Facebook log-in, you are granting permission to Facebook to share your user details with us. This will include your name, email address, date of birth and location which will then be used to form a Guardian identity. You can also use your picture from Facebook as part of your profile. This will also allow us and Facebook to share your, networks, user ID and any other information you choose to share according to your Facebook account settings. If you remove the Guardian app from your Facebook settings, we will no longer have access to this information. If you log-in to our sites using a Google log-in, you grant permission to Google to share your user details with us. This will include your name, email address, date of birth, sex and location which we will then use to form a Guardian identity. You may use your picture from Google as part of your profile. This also allows us to share your networks, user ID and any other information you choose to share according to your Google account settings. If you remove the Guardian from your Google settings, we will no longer have access to this information. If you log-in to our sites using a twitter log-in, we receive your avatar (the small picture that appears next to your tweets) and twitter username.

Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act Compliance

We are in compliance with the requirements of COPPA (Childrens Online Privacy Protection Act), we do not collect any information from anyone under 13 years of age. Our website, products and services are all directed to people who are at least 13 years old or older.

Updating your personal information

We offer a ‘My details’ page (also known as Dashboard), where you can update your personal information at any time, and change your marketing preferences. You can get to this page from most pages on the site – simply click on the ‘My details’ link at the top of the screen when you are signed in.

Online Privacy Policy Only

This online privacy policy applies only to information collected through our website and not to information collected offline.

Your Consent

By using our site, you consent to our privacy policy.

Changes to our Privacy Policy

If we decide to change our privacy policy, we will post those changes on this page.
Save settings
Cookies settings