Home Blog Page 3

Vonoff1700’s Wild Way to Impress a Girl Sparks Outrage

Chicago’s rising drill rapper Vonoff1700 has set the internet ablaze with a shocking comment about how he captures a girl’s attention. The statement joins a long list of celebrity moments that have gone viral, including our report on how Hollywood legend Will Smith was left red-faced after a crowd refused to dance to his music. The 22-year-old artist, born Davon D. Meeks, shared his bold and controversial approach to romance in a video that surfaced on X.

In the clip, which appeared to be from a casual interview, Vonoff1700 claims physical aggression is his go-to move.

“A lot of people can’t do what I do,”

he stated.

“Like, you ever seen a na just get up, slap a na, and just sit back down? That’s the type of stuff I do to impress my girl.”

When an off-camera voice challenged him, the rapper doubled down on his method.

“How? Who else you know that can do that?”

he retorted, suggesting his sheer audacity is the main attraction.

The statement, likely intended to reinforce his tough-guy persona, has sparked a firestorm of mixed reactions. The viral clip of Vonoff1700 explaining how he impresses a girl has divided audiences, with some fans finding it entertaining while others condemn the violent implications. This claim certainly aligns with the gritty, confident vibe of his music, including his hit “Opps On Deck.

As an artist signed to Signal Records under Columbia Records, Vonoff1700 often uses his lyrics to project strength and charisma. The label itself has been in the news, as Atlanta rapper Glokk40spaz recently opened up about his own relationship with Columbia Records’ A&R. Despite his on-record bravado, details about Vonoff1700’s actual love life are scarce, as he is known for keeping his personal affairs private.

On his Instagram, where he has over half a million followers, Vonoff1700’s posts typically focus on his career, flashing cash and luxury cars rather than romance. This new Vonoff1700 viral video, however, suggests he is more than willing to lean into a controversial persona to stand out.

As the clip continues to rack up views, fans are left debating whether the rapper is serious or simply playing a character rooted in drill music culture. Either way, one thing is clear: Vonoff1700 knows exactly how to keep the spotlight on him as his star continues to rise in the world of hip hop.

After 24 Years, 3 More 9/11 Victims Identified Thanks to Breakthrough DNA Efforts

0

Nearly 24 years after the September 11 attacks, three more victims of the World Trade Center tragedy have been identified — a heartbreaking yet powerful reminder of the city’s promise to never stop searching for answers for the families left behind.

The New York City Office of Chief Medical Examiner confirmed the latest identifications this week: Ryan Fitzgerald, 26, of Floral Park, N.Y.; Barbara Keating, 72, of Palm Springs, Calif.; and an adult woman whose family has chosen to keep her name private.

how many 9 11 victims identified so far
After 24 Years Ryan Fitzgerald and Barbara Keating’s remains have been identified 

Fitzgerald, a foreign currency trader at Fiduciary Trust Company International, was working in the South Tower when hijackers struck. Keating, a retired nonprofit executive and beloved grandmother, was on American Airlines Flight 11, which was flown into the North Tower. Their remains — along with those of the unnamed woman — were recovered in the months after the attacks, but the extreme damage made it impossible to confirm their identities until now.

The breakthrough came thanks to next-generation sequencing technology — a cutting-edge DNA analysis that can detect genetic material even in the smallest, most damaged samples. Many of these fragments have been tested 10, even 15 times over the years without results, but scientists refused to give up.

“Nearly 25 years after the disaster at the World Trade Center, our commitment to identify the missing and return them to their loved ones stands as strong as ever,”

Chief Medical Examiner Dr. Jason Graham said in a statement.

“Each new identification testifies to the promise of science and sustained outreach to families despite the passage of time.”

New York City Mayor Eric Adams called the announcement “a step forward in comforting the family members still aching from that day,” noting that the pain of September 11 “echoes across the decades.”

For the families, each new identification is deeply emotional. Paul Keating, Barbara’s son, told NPR he was stunned by the ongoing dedication of the city’s forensic teams.

“They’re doing this for us,” he said. “They’re working their ass off 24 years later.”

Paul also shared how his mother’s death changed his family forever.

“Not a day went by for years that [9/11] wasn’t part of our lives,” he recalled. “My two sons were almost seven and four… they wake up one day and grandmom is dead and bad guys killed her.”

Of the 2,753 people killed at the World Trade Center, about 1,100 — roughly 40% — remain unidentified. The OCME stores those remains with the highest level of care in a secure repository beneath the World Trade Center Memorial site. Testing continues weekly, sometimes from pieces as tiny as a Tic Tac.

This is the first time new identifications have been announced since January 2024, when John Ballantine Nivenbecame the 1,650th victim identified.

Forensic teams say they will keep going, no matter how long it takes. As Dr. Graham put it, “We continue this work as our way of honoring the lost.”

Saweetie Accused of Secret Fling With Offset Before Cardi B Split, Akademiks Claims

0

Rumors about Saweetie and Offset first popped up in March 2021, just after Saweetie’s breakup with Migos rapper Quavo who happens to be Offset’s cousin. Fans assumed that there had been a romantic relationship between Saweetie and Offset, and internet rumors correlated the reported tryst with strife within Migos.

Quavo, in October 2022, dropped a song, Messy, with rap bars fans felt were directed at the supposedly Offset-Saweetie relationship. That rumor, though, was quickly squashed by Cardi B, Offset’s wife at the time, who shot it down publicly. Saweetie, for her side, stayed quiet, not confirming or debunking the rumors.

It gained renewed traction on August 7, 2025, when Offset made appearances on The Joe Budden Podcast where he made relationship remarks some people interpreted as being suggestive. Subsequently, media figure DJ Akademiks went live on his page and called out several women including Saweetie, Ari Fletcher, and Chrisean Rock whom he accused Offset of sleeping with while he was married to Cardi B.

Akademiks offered no photos, messages, or other evidence to back his statements. Within hours, clips from the livestream spread across X and gossip blogs, with headlines presenting the claim as if it were new information.

Cardi B has repeatedly debunked the Offset-Saweetie rumor. From interviews to social media between 2021 to 2023, Cardi B debunked the rumors, calling them “made-up fan fiction.”

Saweetie has never addressed the allegations directly a choice that, according to hip-hop watchers, has allowed speculation to continue. Offset has not commented publicly on the August 2025 claims.

Hip-hop gossip culture feeds on rumors, and social media has been the primary factor to revive old rumors. Here, numerous X users were posting memes and “confirmation” threads without evidence being present. Others called out Akademiks for re-posting an un-substantiated rumor.

X User

View on X

A tweet from X.

Load Tweet

There is also the legal hazard: recirculating unsubstantiated sexual accusations can result in defamation suits, particularly where there is no supporting evidence. That’s why respectable papers usually approach the subject with trepidation, being clear about what is and what isn’t confirmed.

Rumors often revolve around fan beef, ambiguous song lyrics, and casual comments during interviews. Once a rumor starts, it can last for years even without it being true. In this instance, the Offset-Saweetie narrative has come back several times without ever being confirmed.

Kodak Black Slammed by Ex for Jail Setup and Skipping Child Support

0

What began as a child’s birthday celebration in Broward County, Florida, spiraled into a brawl, arrests, and now, one of the most publicized celebrity child support disputes of the year.

Maranda “Mjae” Johnson a reality TV personality and the mother of two of rapper Kodak Black’s children says the February 2025 fight was just the tipping point. Days later, she filed court papers seeking more child support. What followed has been an increasingly bitter back-and-forth between two public figures, played out in legal filings, social media videos, and headlines.

Kodak Black, born Bill Kahan Kapri, is a Grammy-nominated rapper with a chart-topping career and a long history of legal trouble. Johnson, best known for appearing on W.A.G.s to Riches, shares daughter Queen Yuri (born January 2022) and son Prince (born February 2024) with him.

The two separated shortly after Prince’s birth. Their co-parenting relationship has been marked by public spats, and now, a high-stakes fight over money.

In a widely viewed Instagram video, Johnson said:

“I never requested fifty-six thousand dollars… That’s how much his children are entitled to, and I’m still not even asking for half of that.”

She accused Kodak of refusing to contribute fairly:

“It’s like pulling teeth getting him to do anything for his kids… I wake up and do this every day by myself.”

She also claimed:

“You always put your hands on me and I never sent you to jail… Now you got four lawsuits pending against me and you throwing me in jail over something you don’t even care about.”

Social media posts often claim Johnson asked for $56,000/month in child support. However, neither TMZ’s reporting nor Broward County’s public docket lists that figure in accessible court records. Without the actual motion or judge’s order, this remains unconfirmed.

Florida uses an “Income Shares” formula, considering both parents’ incomes, childcare costs, and special expenses. For wealthy parents, this can lead to large payments but the court requires proof through financial affidavits.

X User

View on X

A tweet from X.

Load Tweet

A final hearing will determine whether Kodak’s payments increase beyond $8,500, and whether his defamation countersuit moves forward. In the meantime, both sides appear ready to keep fighting in court and online.

As Johnson put it:

“A man is mad he has to help be a father… but I’m God’s favorite, and that won’t happen he won’t break me.”

For Kodak Black, the outcome could affect not just his finances, but his already complicated public image.

Suno AI Star imoliver Drops Record-Breaking Debut ‘Stone’

The music world is buzzing with a groundbreaking release as Suno’s “AI music designer”, imoliver, drops their debut single “Stone” across all streaming platforms today, August 8, 2025. This track, already a record-breaker with over 3 million streams on Suno before its global launch, marks a pivotal moment for Suno AI music. As the industry grapples with the rise of artificial intelligence, imoliver’s success represents a starkly different path to stardom than our recent coverage on how a sports fortune was leveraged into a music empire, as Suno’s innovative platform reshapes how music is created and consumed.

Suno, launched in December 2023, lets anyone create full songs with vocals and instrumentation using simple text prompts. Its user-friendly approach has made it a favorite among creators, from hobbyists to professionals. Imoliver, the platform’s most-streamed artist, has harnessed this technology to craft “Stone,” a track that’s not only a hit but also a historic milestone.

In late July 2025, imoliver signed with Hallwood Media, becoming the first Suno creator to land a deal with a traditional label. This partnership signals that AI music is no longer just an experiment—it’s a force in the mainstream. The success of “Stone” highlights the power of AI to democratize music creation, letting anyone with a vision produce professional tracks.

X User
@xuser

A post from X.

Load X Post

However, the rapid growth of Suno AI music also raises questions for human artists. With AI flooding the market with new music, standing out is tougher than ever. Legal battles, like the one between Suno and the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) over copyright concerns, add to the tension.

The lawsuit, detailed in a public court filing from the RIAA, claims Suno’s AI may have been trained on copyrighted songs without permission, a debate that could shape the future of the industry. For human artists, the key to thriving alongside AI lies in authenticity.

Live performances, personal storytelling, and unique branding offer connections that AI can’t replicate, a lesson detailed in our report on a Hollywood legend’s recent struggle to connect with an audience. Many artists are also embracing AI as a tool, using platforms like Suno to spark ideas or enhance production while adding their own creative flair. Imoliver’s work shows how humans and AI can collaborate, with the designer shaping prompts to create music that resonates with millions.

Other AI music projects are also making waves. Google’s Magenta creates innovative sounds for artists, while AIVA composes film scores that rival human work. These platforms show AI’s technical prowess, but the emotional depth of human artistry remains unmatched.

As imoliver prepares to release a full album on October 24, 2025, the music world is watching closely to see how AI and human creativity will continue to coexist. “Stone” is more than a song—it’s a sign of the times. With Suno leading the charge and creators like imoliver pushing boundaries, AI music is here to stay.

For human artists, the challenge is clear: embrace the technology, but lean into what makes them uniquely human.

Vitoria Beatriz Death: Brazilian Actress Dead at 28, Reports

0

The adult film industry is mourning the loss of Vitoria Beatriz, a vibrant Brazilian actress who died at just 28 years old on Tuesday, August 5, 2025, after a battle with undisclosed health issues. Hospitalized for several days in critical condition, her passing adds to a series of recent tragedies in the industry, including the recent hospitalization of fellow adult film star Emily Willis. While her family has chosen to keep the details of her condition private, Beatriz’s legacy as a talented performer continues to resonate.

Born on January 1, 1997, in São Paulo, Brazil, Vitoria Beatriz made a significant mark in the adult entertainment world. She was known for her work with Inka Productions, a Peruvian company that highlighted her energy and charisma in a heartfelt farewell video. Her career included collaborations with major production companies like Bang Bros and Brazzers CFNM, with notable credits such as “Ass Parade” and “Giorgio Grandi” listed on her IMDb profile.

Beatriz’s work, including intense scenes like “Yummy Estudio” and “Angelo Godshack Original,” showcased her versatility and drew a large following, with over 26,000 Instagram followers and more than 200,000 on Twitter.

The exact cause of Vitoria Beatriz’s death remains unclear, as her family has not shared specifics. A statement from an admin of her social media account noted that Beatriz had shared “challenges she faced with her physical and mental health,” fueling unconfirmed speculation online. Such claims highlight the immense pressures faced by public figures, a challenge recently addressed when MrBeast’s ex-girlfriend spoke out against social media’s impact. Posts on her Instagram in the days before her passing hinted at a serious medical condition, with her family asking for prayers during her hospitalization. This uncertainty has only deepened the sense of loss among fans who remember her for her warmth.

X User
@xuser

A post from X.

Load X Post

Beyond her professional achievements, Beatriz’s personal life was kept largely private. Growing up in São Paulo, she entered the adult film industry and quickly rose to prominence. Her recent projects in May and June 2025 with Inka Productions in Brazil and Peru underscored her growing influence.

Colleagues, including actress Lisa Bullock, shared emotional tributes online, reflecting on Beatriz’s impact both on and off the screen. The adult film community and fans continue to honor Vitoria Beatriz’s memory, celebrating her contributions to the industry. Her body of work remains a testament to her talent.

Judge Approves Drake’s Subpoena Move Against Key Botting Witness in Kendrick Lamar Feud

A high-profile legal battle between Canadian rapper Drake and Universal Music Group (UMG) has taken another turn.

On August 6, 2025, California Superior Court Judge Jeannette A. Vargas granted Drake’s legal team permission to serve a subpoena on Kojo Menne Asamoah, a potential witness in the case, through alternative methods including certified mail, email, and door-posting after months of unsuccessful attempts to find him.

The move is part of Drake’s ongoing defamation lawsuit against UMG, which claims the label actively promoted Kendrick Lamar’s hit Not Like Us to harm Drake’s reputation.

“We have spent considerable resources trying to reach Mr. Asamoah through traditional means,”

Drake’s attorney wrote in court filings.

“This order ensures he can no longer evade service.”

The dispute centres on Not Like Us, released in early 2025. Drake alleges the track contains false and damaging lyrics suggesting criminal behaviour, and that UMG amplified these allegations through high-profile performances including Super Bowl LIX, watched by over 133 million viewers, and the 2025 Grammy Awards, where the song won Song and Record of the Year.

According to the lawsuit, UMG’s promotional push was not only reputationally harmful but also artificially fuelled by inflated streaming numbers.

At the core of the subpoena is the practice known as “botting” artificially boosting a song’s streaming numbers using automated accounts, or so-called “stream farms.” These bots can make a track appear more popular than it actually is, influencing music charts, royalties, and public perception.

Drake’s legal team claims UMG and its associates, possibly including Asamoah, either facilitated or ignored such manipulation for Not Like Us. UMG and Spotify have denied these allegations, calling them “absurd” and “without merit.”

Court filings describe Asamoah as a key witness who may have knowledge of botting operations and confidential payment arrangements linked to UMG executive Ramon Alvarez-Smikle. Drake’s lawyers say they spent $75,000 trying to track him down, visiting multiple addresses and contacting family and business associates.

He is among 63 potential witnesses identified by Drake’s team a list that also includes UMG CEO Sir Lucian Grainge and Interscope Records CEO John Janick.

The case touches on a wider debate about authenticity in the streaming era. Inflated streaming numbers can distort chart rankings, mislead fans, and shift millions in royalties.

Music industry lawyer Sarah McLean told this outlet:

“If these allegations are proven, it could push for stricter transparency rules in how streaming data is reported and how labels promote music.”

UMG, in its own filings, has argued the lawsuit is “an attack on artistic freedom” and warned against courts interfering with creative expression.

X User

View on X

A tweet from X.

Load Tweet

The subpoena marks a more aggressive phase in Drake’s evidence-gathering efforts. If Asamoah provides documents or testimony supporting Drake’s botting claims, the case could set a precedent for how streaming fraud is handled in court.

The outcome may influence marketing ethics across the music industry, especially for streaming platforms like Spotify and Apple Music where data manipulation can mean millions in extra revenue.

For now, the focus shifts to whether Asamoah responds and whether his testimony will strengthen Drake’s case, or expose fault lines in one of the most closely watched music industry lawsuits of the decade.

TikToker Juicy Jacob Kicked From Mall for Silver Surfer Stunt

0

Influencers often go to great lengths for viral content, but one creator’s latest stunt seemingly crossed the line from online entertainment to public disturbance. TikTok personality Juicy Jacob has become the center of online discussion after being removed from a shopping mall for a bold public performance.

The incident, captured on video and shared on his popular social media channels, shows the creator’s full commitment to a Juicy Jacob Silver Surfer cosplay. Covered head-to-toe in silver body paint and riding a silver board, he glided through the mall’s corridors, mimicking the iconic Marvel Comics character. Shoppers can be seen reacting with a mix of amusement and confusion to the unexpected mall stunt.

The smooth ride came to an abrupt end when mall security intercepted the influencer. In the clip, a guard can be heard telling him, “Sir, you can’t ride that in here, and you need to leave.” The confrontation resulted in the TikToker kicked out of the premises, an outcome that has only amplified the video’s reach. The entire Juicy Jacob Silver Surfer spectacle was designed for maximum impact.

This event is the latest in a series of public antics that creators use to boost their profiles. The video quickly went viral on his Juicy Jacob TikTok account, sparking a debate about the limits of content creation in public spaces. This incident highlights a growing trend in the latest influencer news, where the quest for views can sometimes lead to real-world consequences. While some find his stunt harmless fun, others point to the disruption it caused. The dedication to the Silver Surfer cosplay is undeniable, reminding many of other impressive cosplay creations seen online.

Juicy Jacob’s Silver Surfer act isn’t just a random stunt—it taps into the character’s enduring appeal, especially with the recent release and box office success of the Marvel Cinematic Universe’s (MCU) reboot, The Fantastic Four: First Steps. The film, which premiered on July 25, 2025, has a new take on the Silver Surfer, who is a fan-favorite for his sleek design and cosmic lore. The role is played by Julia Garner, who portrays the character Shalla-Bal, a different iteration from the traditional Norrin Radd. The movie’s strong reception and the new Silver Surfer’s acclaimed performance have undoubtedly added context to why Jacob’s stunt resonated with comic fans and moviegoers alike.

Kodak Black Lawsuit: Rapper Faces $10.6M for ’22 Shooting

A chaotic night in West Hollywood has landed rapper Kodak Black in the middle of a $10.6 million lawsuit. Two men, Mark Schaefer and Adam Rahman, claim they were shot during a violent altercation outside a Super Bowl after-party in 2022, pointing the finger at Kodak as the spark that ignited the incident. The legal battle is the latest public challenge for the artist, who, as previously reported, also faced an emergency custody motion from his child’s mother.

The incident occurred on February 12, 2022, outside The Nice Guy restaurant in West Hollywood, California. It followed a star-studded after-party tied to a private Justin Bieber concert during Super Bowl weekend. Around 2:45 a.m., a street fight broke out, escalating into gunfire that injured four people: a 60-year-old man, a 20-year-old, a 19-year-old, and Kodak Black himself, then 24, who was shot in the leg.

All victims were hospitalized in stable condition, but the shooter remains unidentified, and no arrests have been made. Original news reports from Sky News detailed the incident and the number of victims. In February 2023, Schaefer and Rahman filed the Kodak Black lawsuit, alleging the rapper, whose legal name is Bill Kapri, was the ‘catalyst’ for the violence.

They claim his actions during the fight led to the shooting, causing them severe injuries. The lawsuit now focuses primarily on Kodak, seeking $10.6 million for negligence, assault, battery, and emotional distress, reminiscent of other public disputes involving the rapper, including our coverage of him calling out his baby mama for using his name. The plaintiffs’ lawyer attempted to secure a default judgment against Kodak, arguing that he had failed to respond to the suit.

The original lawsuit against Justin Bieber and the venue was dismissed, a key detail verified by court filings cited in a Soap Central report. Kodak’s attorney, Bradford Cohen, tells a different story. He insists Kodak was a victim, not the instigator, and was trying to help during the chaos.

Cohen points to video footage showing Kodak rushing toward the fight before ducking for cover as shots rang out. He calls the lawsuit a ‘cash grab’ and disputes its validity, claiming Kodak was never properly served with legal documents. The papers were allegedly sent to an outdated address previously owned by Kodak’s mother, and Cohen argues his client was unaware of the case. This adds another layer to the perception of the artist, who has also been praised for quiet acts of charity in his hometown.

The lawsuit remains unresolved. A judge recently rejected two attempts by the plaintiffs to secure a default judgment. The most recent rejection cited inadequate proof of damages, such as medical bills. The plaintiffs have been given another opportunity to submit an updated request, while Kodak’s legal team prepares to fight the claims in court.

The case has sparked debate over who bears responsibility for the violence and whether Kodak, also a victim of the shooting, should face such a hefty financial penalty.

Trump Cuts Funding for $2.4M Black Maternal Health Study at UNC

0

In a small Detroit apartment, 29-year-old Jasmine Carter keeps the appointment card from her next research follow-up pinned to her fridge. She was one of nearly 600 Black women who had agreed to take part in a groundbreaking University of North Carolina (UNC) study on how racism, housing and food insecurity, and healthcare discrimination affect pregnancy and birth outcomes.

Now, she’s not sure if the researchers will ever call back.

“I thought we were finally being heard,” Carter said. “Then they just… stopped.”

Her uncertainty stems from a sudden decision earlier this year: the Trump administration froze and partially terminated the study’s funding, leaving its future in doubt.

The project, officially titled Looking Back to Look Forward: Social Environment Across the Life Course, Epigenetics, and Birth Outcomes in Black Families, was led by Dr. Jaime Slaughter-Acey, an associate professor of epidemiology at UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health.

Granted $2.4 million in 2021 by the National Institute on Aging, part of National Institutes of Health (NIH), the study sought to fill a massive knowledge gap in American maternal health knowledge. It would collect surveys, biological samples, and multi-generational histories from new mothers, their babies, and their own mothers linking lived experiences of racism and stress to biological “epigenetic” changes that may affect pregnancy outcomes.

“This wasn’t just about data,”

Dr. Slaughter-Acey said.

“It was about telling the full story of Black women’s lives and how society shapes our health.”

In early 2025, the White House and Office of Management and Budget moved to roll back more than $4.4 billion in NIH grants, targeting many tied to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) or reproductive health.

Dr. Slaughter-Acey’s project lost $581,000 the last portion of its grant. NIH’s official reason: the study “no longer aligned with the agency’s priorities” and would not “increase life expectancy.”

The cuts hit other universities, including Columbia, UCLA, and Michigan State, and came just months after the administration proposed capping NIH indirect costs at 15%. According to Roll Call, 1,902 grants were affected between January and July 2025.

A Boston federal judge in June ordered NIH to reinstate 891 canceled projects, but logistical hurdles lost staff, dismantled labs, dissolved partnerships have made full restarts impossible for some.

CDC data show the maternal mortality rate for Black women was about 69.9 deaths per 100,000 live births in 2022 nearly three times the rate for white women (26.6). The leading causes include heart disease, hemorrhage, hypertensive disorders, and infections, and most are preventable.

The disparities are fueled by what public health experts call “social determinants of health” factors like housing, income, neighborhood safety, and access to quality care. Dr. Slaughter-Acey’s study aimed to measure how these stressors get “under the skin” by altering gene activity, a field known as epigenetics.

X User

View on X

A tweet from X.

Load Tweet

About 65% of Black birthing people rely on Medicaid during pregnancy, according to Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, making them especially vulnerable to gaps in care.

“This was one of the few studies designed to explain not just what’s happening, but why,”

said Dr. Alison Stuebe, a UNC collaborator.

The funding cuts sparked swift backlash. In March, 484 NIH employees signed the “Bethesda Declaration” condemning the rollback as political interference in science.

“This is a dangerous precedent elected officials deciding what kinds of science are worth doing based on ideology, not evidence,”

said one NIH scientist who requested anonymity.

Supporters of the cuts frame them as fiscal responsibility. A White House spokesperson said in February that the administration was

“realigning funding toward research that maximizes public health impact and measurable life expectancy gains.”

Since the funding freeze, Dr. Slaughter-Acey has scrambled to keep parts of the project alive with bridge funding from Michigan State University and small public donations. But without full federal support, much of the original work including long-term follow-up with families like Jasmine Carter’s is stalled.

“You can’t pause lives,”

she said.

“Pregnancies, births, and the effects of stress keep happening whether we’re there to document them or not.”

For Carter, the uncertainty is more than an academic loss.

“If they figure out why so many Black moms like me are having complications,”

she said,

“maybe my daughter won’t face the same risks when she grows up.”

Diddy Plans Quiet Return Home, Skips Madison Square Garden Show After Release

Sean “Diddy” Combs isn’t planning a flashy comeback the moment he walks out of prison — instead, he’ll be heading home to his family.

The hip-hop mogul’s attorney, Marc Agnifilo, is setting the record straight after earlier comments sparked speculation about an immediate Madison Square Garden performance. Speaking to TMZ, Agnifilo said Combs’ main priority is personal, not professional.

“He wants to get out of jail, reestablish a loving, present relationship with all of his seven children. He wants to take care of his mother,” Agnifilo shared.

While the lawyer had previously told CBS News that Combs would “be back at Madison Square Garden,” he now clarifies that any such event would be a long-term possibility — and not guaranteed.

“Once Diddy feels they’re in a good spot, he’ll do something special… though that’s not a sure thing,” Agnifilo explained.

The change in tone marks a notable shift from reports suggesting the 55-year-old music icon was gearing up for a rapid return to the stage. Instead, those closest to him say he’s determined to put his energy into repairing and nurturing relationships with his loved ones — especially his mother and children, who have stood by him throughout his legal ordeal.

In July 2025, Combs was convicted on two counts of transportation for prostitution under the Mann Act. He was acquitted of more serious charges, including sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy. He is scheduled to be sentenced on October 3, 2025, and could face between one and three years in prison, with credit for time served.

Currently held at Brooklyn’s Metropolitan Detention Center, Combs has been denied bail five times. Judge Arun Subramanian has cited concerns that he poses a flight risk and could be a danger to the community, noting past incidents of violence.

Agnifilo says his client has been using his time behind bars for personal reflection.

“He’s reflected on the blessings he’s been given, the imperfections he sees in himself,” the attorney told TMZ. “He’s currently working hard on his flaws and is convinced he’s on the road to redemption.”

Fans hoping for a Madison Square Garden moment will have to wait. Diddy’s team says any performance will only come once he’s focused on what matters most — being present for the people who mean the most to him.

Ex-Aide Accuses Busta Rhymes of Assault in Explosive New Legal Battle

Busta Rhymes is facing serious legal trouble after his former personal assistant filed a federal lawsuit accusing the hip-hop star of assault, workplace abuse, wage violations, and blacklisting him from the music industry.

The lawsuit, filed Monday, Aug. 4, in Brooklyn federal court, stems from a January 10 incident at the 53-year-old rapper’s upscale home in the DUMBO neighborhood of Brooklyn. In court documents obtained by PEOPLE, the assistant, Dashiel Gables, 50, claims the altercation began when he received a phone call from his daughter while unloading luggage.

According to the complaint, Busta — whose real name is Trevor Smith Jr. — allegedly became enraged, punching Gables “numerous times” in the face and yelling, “Stay the f— off your phone” and “Don’t tell about your kid, the f— that gotta do with me?”

Police reports show Gables was treated at NYC Health and Hospitals/Woodhull for swelling on the left side of his face and later released in stable condition. Four days after the alleged incident, Busta turned himself in at the NYPD’s 84th precinct, where he was charged with third-degree assault, a misdemeanor that carries up to one year in prison.

In addition to the assault claim, Gables alleges that the “Break Ya Neck” rapper created an abusive workplace environment — accusing him of yelling at staff, spitting in employees’ faces, slapping the backs of their heads, and grabbing their clothing. The lawsuit also claims Busta failed to pay proper wages and overtime in violation of federal and state labor laws, and that Gables has been “effectively blacklisted” from jobs in the hip-hop industry since going to the police.

Gables is seeking unspecified damages for lost wages, emotional distress, unpaid overtime, and future income loss, and has requested a jury trial.

Busta Rhymes is strongly denying the allegations. In a statement to TMZ Hip Hop and other outlets, he said:

“I completely and categorically deny these allegations. For a very brief period, Dashiel assisted me, but it did not work out. Apparently, Dashiel has decided to respond to being let go by manufacturing claims against me in an attempt to attack and damage my reputation.”

Calling the lawsuit “an attempted shake-down by a disgruntled former assistant,” Busta says he plans to file a countersuit and is “confident the truth will prevail.”

The lawsuit comes during a milestone year for the rapper, who recently received a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame, wrapped filming The Naked Gun reboot alongside Liam Neeson, and is preparing to release a new album.

This isn’t Busta’s first run-in with the law — his past includes a 2015 arrest for allegedly throwing a protein drink at a gym employee, a 2007 DWI charge, and other assault and weapons charges dating back to the 1990s.

As of now, both sides are preparing for what could be a lengthy legal fight. Gables is scheduled to hold a press conference in Brooklyn’s Columbus Park to discuss his claims, while Busta remains focused on defending his name.

O Block Ray Rilla Arrested for Forcing Two Teens to Hand Over Phones and School iPads at Gunpoint

Chicago police say a distinctive tattoo led them straight to a man accused of robbing two 16-year-old boys at gunpoint — and now, he’s facing serious charges.

Ramon Bell, 30, known locally as “O Block Ray Rilla,” was arrested after prosecutors allege he confronted the teens late on May 24 behind a restaurant in the 6400 block of South Martin Luther King Drive.

According to authorities, Bell was armed with a pistol that had a red “switch” — a small illegal device that can make a handgun fire automatically like a machine gun. Prosecutors say Bell threatened the boys before taking their cell phones, school-issued Chromebooks, and an iPad.

But the robbery didn’t end there. Investigators claim Bell then forced the teens inside the restaurant, ordered them to write down their device passwords, and marched them back outside before fleeing in a white minivan.

The victims told police their attacker had a distinctive tattoo under his right eye: “a box next to a question mark.” That detail proved crucial. When officers shared the description with Parkway Gardens security staff — the South Side housing complex famously known as O Block — one guard immediately recognized Bell.

Police say they found him walking just three blocks from the crime scene and took him into custody without incident. He’s now charged with armed robbery and aggravated robbery and is being held without bail.

O Block, part of Parkway Gardens, is known both for its deep ties to Chicago’s drill rap culture and its association with gang activity. It’s been home to several well-known rappers, including the late King Von.

Authorities say Bell’s arrest highlights two growing concerns: the increasing use of illegally modified “switch” firearms in Chicago and the targeting of minors for their valuable electronics.

Court records show Bell appeared before Judge Lindsay Huge, who ordered him detained. His next court date has not yet been set, and prosecutors have not confirmed whether federal charges for the weapon modification will follow.

Baby Holly Clouse Found: 40-Year Texas Mystery Solved

A chilling mystery that haunted Texas for over four decades took a stunning turn when a missing infant, presumed dead, was found alive. In 1981, the decomposed bodies of Dean and Tina Clouse were discovered in a wooded area near Houston, their infant daughter Holly Marie nowhere to be found. Fast forward to 2022, and Holly, now 42, was located alive in Oklahoma, unaware of the tragic fate of her parents or the dark secrets of her past.

This gripping murder mystery, marked by heartbreak, forensic breakthroughs, and an astonishing reunion, continues to unravel as investigators hunt for answers. In 1980, Dean and Tina Clouse, a young couple from New Smyrna Beach, Florida, moved to Lewisville, Texas, with their one-year-old daughter, Holly Marie, born on January 24, 1980. Dean, 21, was a carpenter seeking new opportunities, while Tina, 17, was a devoted mother.

The couple had married in June 1979, full of hope for their future. But by October 1980, their families lost all contact with them, sparking worry. Dean’s sister later reported that the couple’s car was returned to Florida with a claim they had joined a religious group, fueling speculation they may have been drawn into a cult.

On January 12, 1981, a gruesome discovery was made in a boggy, wooded area near Wallisville Road, north of Houston, about 250 miles from Lewisville. A civilian’s dog uncovered a decomposing human arm, leading authorities to two badly decomposed bodies. Autopsies revealed the man had been bound, beaten, and killed by blunt trauma, while the woman was strangled.

With no identification possible at the time, the remains were buried as “The Harris County Does” in anonymous graves, a tragic scenario similar to other investigations we’ve covered, including the complex ‘Jane Doe’ questions in the Diddy sex trafficking trial. Holly Marie, just one year old, was missing, and fears grew that she, too, had met a tragic end. For 40 years, the case remained a haunting cold case, with no answers for the Clouse and Linn families.

In 2011, a glimmer of hope emerged when the bodies were exhumed for DNA testing, funded by a National Institute of Justice grant. By late 2020, forensic genealogists from Identifinders International, using databases like Gedmatch, took on the case. On January 12, 2021, exactly 40 years after the bodies were found, the Texas Attorney General’s Cold Case and Missing Persons Unit announced a breakthrough: the remains were Dean and Tina Clouse.

This identification, achieved through advanced DNA analysis, was a major step, but Holly’s fate remained unknown. The case took an extraordinary turn in June 2022 when Holly Marie Clouse was found alive in Oklahoma, working as a waitress in Cushing and living with her husband, children, and grandchildren. Unaware of her true identity or her parents’ brutal murders, Holly had been raised by a pastor after being left at a church in Yuma, Arizona, at age two.

Two barefoot women in white robes, believed to be members of a nomadic religious group called the Christ Family, also known as “Jesus Freaks,” had dropped her off. This group, founded by Charles Franklin “Lightning Amen” McHugh, was known for its strict practices, including vegetarianism and gender separation, and is now a focal point in the investigation. Authorities believe Dean and Tina were murdered, possibly by members of the Christ Family, after expressing a desire to leave the group.

Holly’s abandonment at the church suggests she was abducted following her parents’ deaths and later left behind, possibly to avoid suspicion. Holly, who has no memory of these events, learned of her parents’ fate in 2022 and described the news as overwhelming. In November 2022, with support from the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, she reunited with her biological family in Florida, an emotional milestone in this decades-long saga.

The investigation into the Dean and Tina Clouse murder remains active, led by the Harris County Police and the Texas Attorney General’s Cold Case Unit. To date, no suspects have been named, but the Christ Family’s involvement is a key focus. Holly has since become an advocate for missing persons, working with the Dean and Tina Linn Clouse Memorial Fund, a nonprofit established in October 2022.

Her efforts, alongside Genealogy For Justice, led to the identification of a 1982 South Carolina Jane Doe, Virginia Higgins Ray, in 2023, showing the broader impact of this case. This case, linked to the notorious Texas Killing Fields, remains one of Houston’s most perplexing mysteries. Why were Dean and Tina killed? Who took Holly, and how did she end up in Arizona? As investigators continue their work, the Clouse family holds onto hope for justice.

For Holly, now reconnected with her roots, the journey is bittersweet, marked by the joy of family and the pain of a past she never knew.

We use cookies to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. View more
Cookies settings
Accept
Decline
Privacy & Cookie policy
Privacy & Cookies policy
Cookie name Active

Privacy Policy

What information do we collect?

We collect information from you when you register on our site or place an order. When ordering or registering on our site, as appropriate, you may be asked to enter your: name, e-mail address or mailing address.

What do we use your information for?

Any of the information we collect from you may be used in one of the following ways: To personalize your experience (your information helps us to better respond to your individual needs) To improve our website (we continually strive to improve our website offerings based on the information and feedback we receive from you) To improve customer service (your information helps us to more effectively respond to your customer service requests and support needs) To process transactions Your information, whether public or private, will not be sold, exchanged, transferred, or given to any other company for any reason whatsoever, without your consent, other than for the express purpose of delivering the purchased product or service requested. To administer a contest, promotion, survey or other site feature To send periodic emails The email address you provide for order processing, will only be used to send you information and updates pertaining to your order.

How do we protect your information?

We implement a variety of security measures to maintain the safety of your personal information when you place an order or enter, submit, or access your personal information. We offer the use of a secure server. All supplied sensitive/credit information is transmitted via Secure Socket Layer (SSL) technology and then encrypted into our Payment gateway providers database only to be accessible by those authorized with special access rights to such systems, and are required to?keep the information confidential. After a transaction, your private information (credit cards, social security numbers, financials, etc.) will not be kept on file for more than 60 days.

Do we use cookies?

Yes (Cookies are small files that a site or its service provider transfers to your computers hard drive through your Web browser (if you allow) that enables the sites or service providers systems to recognize your browser and capture and remember certain information We use cookies to help us remember and process the items in your shopping cart, understand and save your preferences for future visits, keep track of advertisements and compile aggregate data about site traffic and site interaction so that we can offer better site experiences and tools in the future. We may contract with third-party service providers to assist us in better understanding our site visitors. These service providers are not permitted to use the information collected on our behalf except to help us conduct and improve our business. If you prefer, you can choose to have your computer warn you each time a cookie is being sent, or you can choose to turn off all cookies via your browser settings. Like most websites, if you turn your cookies off, some of our services may not function properly. However, you can still place orders by contacting customer service. Google Analytics We use Google Analytics on our sites for anonymous reporting of site usage and for advertising on the site. If you would like to opt-out of Google Analytics monitoring your behaviour on our sites please use this link (https://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout/)

Do we disclose any information to outside parties?

We do not sell, trade, or otherwise transfer to outside parties your personally identifiable information. This does not include trusted third parties who assist us in operating our website, conducting our business, or servicing you, so long as those parties agree to keep this information confidential. We may also release your information when we believe release is appropriate to comply with the law, enforce our site policies, or protect ours or others rights, property, or safety. However, non-personally identifiable visitor information may be provided to other parties for marketing, advertising, or other uses.

Registration

The minimum information we need to register you is your name, email address and a password. We will ask you more questions for different services, including sales promotions. Unless we say otherwise, you have to answer all the registration questions. We may also ask some other, voluntary questions during registration for certain services (for example, professional networks) so we can gain a clearer understanding of who you are. This also allows us to personalise services for you. To assist us in our marketing, in addition to the data that you provide to us if you register, we may also obtain data from trusted third parties to help us understand what you might be interested in. This ‘profiling’ information is produced from a variety of sources, including publicly available data (such as the electoral roll) or from sources such as surveys and polls where you have given your permission for your data to be shared. You can choose not to have such data shared with the Guardian from these sources by logging into your account and changing the settings in the privacy section. After you have registered, and with your permission, we may send you emails we think may interest you. Newsletters may be personalised based on what you have been reading on theguardian.com. At any time you can decide not to receive these emails and will be able to ‘unsubscribe’. Logging in using social networking credentials If you log-in to our sites using a Facebook log-in, you are granting permission to Facebook to share your user details with us. This will include your name, email address, date of birth and location which will then be used to form a Guardian identity. You can also use your picture from Facebook as part of your profile. This will also allow us and Facebook to share your, networks, user ID and any other information you choose to share according to your Facebook account settings. If you remove the Guardian app from your Facebook settings, we will no longer have access to this information. If you log-in to our sites using a Google log-in, you grant permission to Google to share your user details with us. This will include your name, email address, date of birth, sex and location which we will then use to form a Guardian identity. You may use your picture from Google as part of your profile. This also allows us to share your networks, user ID and any other information you choose to share according to your Google account settings. If you remove the Guardian from your Google settings, we will no longer have access to this information. If you log-in to our sites using a twitter log-in, we receive your avatar (the small picture that appears next to your tweets) and twitter username.

Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act Compliance

We are in compliance with the requirements of COPPA (Childrens Online Privacy Protection Act), we do not collect any information from anyone under 13 years of age. Our website, products and services are all directed to people who are at least 13 years old or older.

Updating your personal information

We offer a ‘My details’ page (also known as Dashboard), where you can update your personal information at any time, and change your marketing preferences. You can get to this page from most pages on the site – simply click on the ‘My details’ link at the top of the screen when you are signed in.

Online Privacy Policy Only

This online privacy policy applies only to information collected through our website and not to information collected offline.

Your Consent

By using our site, you consent to our privacy policy.

Changes to our Privacy Policy

If we decide to change our privacy policy, we will post those changes on this page.
Save settings
Cookies settings